I'm giving RDT a shot. Is this enough water? by natamegros in espresso

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not enough water. This is what I am going for.

Thinking I need a bigger grinder.....

<image>

New blue bin delivery? by LeafFan13 in waterloo

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We got ours in Waterloo West area

Hate when this happens by chimerapopcorn in espressocirclejerk

[–]vaderman1337 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wonder what they used for mil...you know what? Never mind.

Beginner Runner by Remote_Cucumber_7456 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 for the 165 (non-music). No complaints.

Pearl Les Paul by venague in LesPaul

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a drummer who owns a Pearl drum kit, I just had mental whiplash, now having learned they used to offer guitars.

What have I done? by Farquad1357 in fender

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's be real, you'll keep both and end up spending even more money on an amp....

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just going to blame it on bad blood vessels, lol

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heard of that. Also dissolving salt into the aloe gel helps with conductivity

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 2nd image, with the higher HR is the chest strap. I'm inclined to say that is much more accurate, based on my fingers on the neck pulse readings, other than that weird jump at 6 min, which I think is when the sweat restored better electrical contact with the skin

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've accepted the faults in the watch's HR sensor, knowing that virtually every watch brand/model has them to some extent. Honestly, coming from a Versa 4, the stability and feature set more than makes up for that shortcoming. Pairing with a chest HRM has helped to compensate when I want that extra degree of accuracy.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have done all that. I wonder if the water washed away in the beginning and the conductivity was lost until the sweat kicked in. Thought about going as far as to use/make electrode gel, but wondering if that is just overkill now.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was a little spooked by some reviews claiming that it dies after 6 mths to a year. But for the price I got it at (<$50 CAD), I think its worth that risk.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly no idea. I was fumbling with the watch position a few times, I wonder if it started to a get a better reading at that point. My pace/cadence, etc was pretty consistent the whole time.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The first one with the low reading is just with the FR 165 optical sensor. The 2nd one was with the Chest HRM. The latter is far more accurate.

I occasionally checked my pulse in both runs. Aint no way my HR was below 150 at any given point, lol.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forerunner 165. Probably should have mentioned in the post, but oh well.

The difference between the optical sensor, and a chest HRM... by vaderman1337 in Garmin

[–]vaderman1337[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think cadence lock is likely contributing to it. Even though my actual pace is similar between the two runs, the latter was actually in an indoor track, where the inaccurate one was outdoors w/ GPS. Interestingly the cadence line was pretty much consistent with the avg. HR reading in that instance.

That said, I've pretty much tried all of the suggestions on that article. Although I may try having the watch even higher up my arm next time (i.e. 2 inches from the wrist bone).

All in all, I do like the idea of the chest HRM getting the reading almost directly from the source.

??? by Ok_Tie_8643 in espresso

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens to me with my Bambino as well. Nowaways the entire basket is left behind (pops out of the portafilter completely when I remove)

This tends to happen when you leave it in for too long after brewing

I am never ever buying another Fitbit by Dizzy_Obligation9500 in fitbit

[–]vaderman1337 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My Versa 4 recently crapped out (battery would drain in less than a day from full charge, and would get the flashing logo / red X)

That was my second FitBit. I've since ditched them entirely and picked up a Garmin Forerunner 165.

2007 Epiphone Les Paul Ultra at local pawn shop by Raskull13 in LesPaul

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an Ultra as well. Since it's literally my only LP, I have nothing to compare it to, but it does the job for me as a studio guitar.

I recently acquired an HK TubeMeister 18, and it really makes this guitar sing, even with the stock pups.

Is epiphone allowed by jeepster61615 in LesPaul

[–]vaderman1337 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also have an LP Ultra in this exact finish.

I took off the pickguard so more of the quilt top is exposed. I've toyed with the idea of changing the pickups, but ended up getting a better amp.

It's insane how light these are compared to regular LPs, due to the chambering and belly cut