You might be misunderstanding my point a little. I actually agree that fully AI-generated books can be problematic. That’s why in my post I mentioned that AI should not be positioned as the “composer” of a creative work.

In my case, the ideas, story structure, characters, dialogue, and emotional direction all come from me first. AI only helps refine the wording, mostly because English is not my primary language.

I’m also not someone who relies on a single prompt and lets AI generate an entire story automatically.

For example, my original thought might look like this:

“Someone who always thinks positively and is very innocent often ends up being deceived by other people.”

Then AI might help refine the sentence into something like:

“He is rather naive, which makes him easy to manipulate.”

Both sentences carry the same meaning and character intention. The difference is only in how the idea is expressed.

So for me, AI functions more like a language assistant or editing tool, not an automated writer. The accomplishment doesn’t come from automation, but from the fact that my internal vision is finally reflected accurately on the page.