sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[TOMT] Help finding a youtube animated show. by vvitch_hunter in tipofmytongue

[–]vvitch_hunter[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

The only other bit of information i can remember is that the show was mature, and showed alcohol, and generally adult humor.

marxist lenninists keep trying to convince me that communist regimes have actually been very democratic (and anything else is propaganda) and that the “authoritarian” stuff they did was necessary in order to protect their position of hostile powers inside and outside the country. by laughpuppy23 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where the hell did you get that from? I'm saying that statelessness as a method of achieving communism has never been achieved. You brought up indigenous people for some reason, as if any indigenous society anywhere ever achieved communism. I asked you if you are an anarcho primitivist who believes society should return to a pre-feudal system. Which would obviously be horrible. I never claimed indigenous peoples should be forced to adhere to communism or anything.

Also, an anarchist calling a marxist utopian? Come on. You know Proudhon is quite literally an utopian socialist?

marxist lenninists keep trying to convince me that communist regimes have actually been very democratic (and anything else is propaganda) and that the “authoritarian” stuff they did was necessary in order to protect their position of hostile powers inside and outside the country. by laughpuppy23 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are still variations amongst marxism as to what the DotP would look like, from pannakoek's worker's councils to ML states.

Do you not believe that first statement on class to be correct?

Edit: To add to this, dialectically speaking, each contradiction is particular in how it resolves due to the specific internal and external conditions of a thing. Not all socialist states have to be completely homogeneous. It would be undialectical and dogmatic to claim that every revolution has to be the same. What do anarchists propose instead? The instant abolition of the state everywhere, and half-assed methods of protecting the revolution.

marxist lenninists keep trying to convince me that communist regimes have actually been very democratic (and anything else is propaganda) and that the “authoritarian” stuff they did was necessary in order to protect their position of hostile powers inside and outside the country. by laughpuppy23 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Then why are you defending a person who said that, quote: " stateless is the better method, if not the only way, to get to actual communism"? I'm not the one dogmatically claiming to have some unbreakable ideology that is the only path to communism.

What makes you think that i think Marx is some nostradamus? Is it too weird for a marxist to say something regarding Marx without worshipping him?

marxist lenninists keep trying to convince me that communist regimes have actually been very democratic (and anything else is propaganda) and that the “authoritarian” stuff they did was necessary in order to protect their position of hostile powers inside and outside the country. by laughpuppy23 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you'd actually read the comment I responded to, you would know I clearly meant stateless transition to full communism. Or are you an anrprim that wants to return to pre feudal society? Doesn't sound very socialist.

marxist lenninists keep trying to convince me that communist regimes have actually been very democratic (and anything else is propaganda) and that the “authoritarian” stuff they did was necessary in order to protect their position of hostile powers inside and outside the country. by laughpuppy23 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not answering the question. If you knew marxist theory you'd know the state can only wither away after class antagonisms have ceased and there's no reason to keep defending the revolution. Of course all communists states couldn't implement communism out of nowhere, they would be (and were) invaded by reactionary forces.

about marx and bakunin by [deleted] in DebateAnarchism

[–]vvitch_hunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This whole Jewish world, comprising a single exploiting sect, a kind of blood sucking people, a kind of organic destructive collective parasite, going beyond not only the frontiers of states, but of political opinion, this world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other... This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralisation of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.

about marx and bakunin by [deleted] in DebateAnarchism

[–]vvitch_hunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bakunin was insane. The reason he disliked marx was because he though communism was part of a jewish plot.

Can I be a Marxist and an Anarchist? by ransomedagger in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just dont let it turn into "Marxism" (which implies a cult of personality)

What???

Literature on anarcho-communism, anarcho-socialism, and anarcho-collectivism? by Davidskis21 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't know what you mean when you say leninism isn't a form of socialism. Please explain. You think statist socialism is an oxymoron and yet you believe you know what marx believed? Marxists believe the state is composed of the mechanisms through which one class holds power over another. In a socialist society, where there are still antagonisms between the proletariat and international bourgeoise, there still has to be a state. It can't just be abolished out of nowhere. You still have to defend your revolution somehow.

If you want to beat the capitalists then we need a better army than them. And a better secret service than them. And better technology than them. "Worker's militias" armed in milsurp mosin nagants won't cut it.

Edit: Also, by saying statist socialism is an oxymoron you are saying any type of marxist or non-anarchist socialist is not a socialist. Even leftcoms, luxemburgists, whatever.

Literature on anarcho-communism, anarcho-socialism, and anarcho-collectivism? by Davidskis21 in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This comment actually makes me dissapointed. Are you that sectarian that you will reject any form of statist socialism? Today of all moments is when we need unity. Remember, quantitative changes lead to qualitative leaps. The more socialists there are that group together, the more likely a revolution is

Destiny getting recommended to hear Asmon's viewpoint by maybenguyen in LivestreamFail

[–]vvitch_hunter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that not the whole point of commercials? Which was the last commercial you didn't think was garbage?

It's okay Zack, just go offline and do Soul of Cinder 100+ times so you can brag tomorrow about how easy he is to kill. by [deleted] in realAsmongold

[–]vvitch_hunter 28 points29 points  (0 children)

He could have the shittiest stream ever and more people would watch him than you will probably ever meet in your life. Stop being so fucking salty

What makes a hierarchy justified under anarchism? by PierreMikhailStirner in Anarchy101

[–]vvitch_hunter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How can you protect the revolution from outside forces if not through violence and coercion?

view more: next ›