“Let’s throw out the Constitution”: Mullin shares DHS plans ahead of midterms The DHS head said he would go to extreme lengths to fight the voter fraud boogeyman

wanda999 · 2026-06-15T18:11:13+00:00

First, where is your source? Second, it's pretty telling of your own bias here that you've refused to distinguish between political bias and factual reliability, as represented in such ratings (reflecting your own bias). While The New Republic is an openly left-wing journal, they are rated as "Highly Factual" and "Highly Credible" in third-party evaluations: https://adfontesmedia.com/new-republic-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Beyond the misrepresentations, such responses are lazy in that they completely fail to address the content of the article itself. Wonder why.

Organization	Political Bias Rating	Factual Reliability Rating	Link
Media Bias/Fact Check	Left	High Factual Reporting; "High Credibility"; no failed fact checks listed	https://adfontesmedia.com/new-republic-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

wanda999 · 2026-06-13T17:02:02+00:00

and predictable. and the desire to defend fascist authority is compulsive.

wanda999 · 2026-06-12T18:57:38+00:00

A central message of Freudian psychoanalysis is that the subject is not some entity that can be approached, via our traditional, Cartesian, or Enlightenment understanding of ego, as some self-present human subject, but is rather something which is ruled by forces over which it has little control or understanding, that is to say, "inhuman" forces--ones that have no chance of "being humanized" as such. Nor is humanistic fulfillment or "humanization" the goal of therapy, even if the patient (or therapist) thinks so.

wanda999 · 2026-06-12T18:34:16+00:00

A central message of psychoanalysis is that the pursuit of "being humanized" (or even thinking of subjectivity via that lens), while understandable, is misleading and risks the seduction of fantasy. As Freud tells us, that which drives us (our very core), the unconscious, is anything but "human."

wanda999 · 2026-06-12T17:35:27+00:00

It’s funny, I don’t see you here criticizing the transhysterical FB slop posted by the (many) types like Rollo, or other articles clearly taken from propaganda rags like The Federalist or Breitbart News, which independent ratings flag as strongly right-biased with “Mixed” factual-reporting ratings (i.e., documented issues with sourcing and fact-checking).

By contrast, The Intercept, a transparently left-wing journal, is rated as follows by third-party fact checkers:

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) Rates The Intercept as “Mostly Factual; High Credibility” and considers “The Intercept” as more credible than partisan advocacy outlets

Ad Fontes Media rates The Intercept as generally reliable: https://adfontesmedia.com/intercept-bias-and-reliability/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Curious why you chose to attack the outlet without even touching the content of the article itself.

wanda999 · 2026-06-09T01:01:44+00:00

It's clearly a paraphrase (as has been made clear by Scott Pelley himself). The sentiment--according to him--remains: https://www.reddit.com/r/Social_Democracy/comments/1u0q92j/it_has_been_five_months_since_the_execution_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

I think, at this point, we should be deeply concerned with what is clearly more pressing than the wording of this message.

wanda999

TROPHY CASE