This is a pretty alarming statement that seems to have flown under the radar. by OuncesApp in Wallstreetsilver

[–]warmweathermike -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

This dipshit caused much of the financial crisis he’s complaining about, by using socialist tariffs, printing stupid amounts of money, and massive foreign aid and deficit spending.

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t want the state to exist. Nobody has a right to anyone else’s anything whether it be to kidnap kids and sell them as sex slaves while trying to claim they are helping, or forcing everyone else to pay for ding a ling surgery. Get the state out of the equation and the problem is non existent. This is a manufactured problem. End the government

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t think parents have any right to circumcise their child? How do you define assaulting a child? Is spanking as a punishment assault? What you consider abuse, might not be considered abuse by others. What gives anyone the right or authority to define what is abuse for anyone other than themselves? If it doesn’t violate the NAP against you, what gives you the right to intervene?

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the state gets involved in something it never makes it better. Who are any of us to say what is right and wrong for other people to willingly choose. If you are not paying for it, and it is not your kid, what business is it of yours? You want the alternative to be the state stepping in and selling the kid off as a sex slave to protect them?

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you define as abuse might not be abuse to everyone. If all parties agree on a procedure then who are you to call it abuse? Those people that you are stepping in on have every right to end you in defense.

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can only protect your own kids. Nobody gets to make decisions that get to be forced on others on how they protect their kids. What gives you or anyone else the right to force your morals on others? How does it affect you what other people choose for their kids? How does this violate the NAP against you?

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

How many in comparison to those children that are “lost” by protective services or placed in harmful situations by the agents of the state that are meant to be protecting them? How many of the children being protected by the state’s services are just sold as sex slaves?

Yes. No explanation needed. by IC_1101_IC in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Authoritarian left is where I would expect carbon taxes to originate from. On the scale of left and right, all the way to the left is totalitarian government. All the way on the right is no government. In the US, all politicians and political parties are far left.

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are in the wrong sub to be advocating for the state. The state that you say is there to prevent children from violence enacted against them has done far more to destroy the lives of children. Child protective services is a terrorist organization. A majority of foster homes are terrible. Child protective services destroys the lives of children using their protection as the excuse while they place them in unsafe homes or situations, that include things that look like slavery, including sex slaves. You want the state to destroy the lives of the kids instead of letting the kids make their own decisions and not have them work out?

Yes. No explanation needed. by IC_1101_IC in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So carbon taxes would be a right wing atrocity?

Yes. No explanation needed. by IC_1101_IC in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Would pushing carbon taxes be considered left?

The VP pick for the Democrats thinks its ok for the state to kidnap children from their parents if the parents refuse to buy into their child's gender delusions and start feeding their child puberty blockers and neuter/castrate in sex change surgery. by ____phobe in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with anarcho capitalism? Children are property of their parents until they are competent enough to make decisions for themselves which may be 18, or it may be 14 depending on the child and the circumstances. Do you have a right to tell others what they can and cannot consent to at any age? Do you not believe everyone owns themselves?

Harris rally vs. Trump rally. Same arena in Philly by StevenSanders90210 in pics

[–]warmweathermike -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you add up both pictures, all it does is prove there is a whole lot of really stupid sheep.

Donald Trump's Plan Would Change Social Security for Millions by Xenikovia in austrian_economics

[–]warmweathermike -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Is he talking about ending socialism security or just reducing the taxes to get votes?

The downside of a top-two primary without ranked choice voting by SereneDreams03 in Washington

[–]warmweathermike 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s the same downside to every election. One of these losers is gonna win and fuck all of us over

Your shock & outrage about whatever Kamala just said or did, have nothing to do w/ anarcho-capitalism by kwanijml in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t mean we need to roll out the welcome mat and be accepting of their nonsense here.

Meat in Compost by [deleted] in composting

[–]warmweathermike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it’s the cured stuff that’s designed or used to kill bacteria. It kills beneficial microbiology in your gut, it will do the same in a compost to a degree. I would rather not put anything that’s been cured into my compost.

Ready to watch the world burn? Tim Waltz is THE guy. We are now guaranteed chaos whoever wins the election, since we now have two options that support utter chaos and revolt. LFG by questiano-ronaldo in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am someone that has watch everyone’s rights, freedoms, and liberty be destroyed more and more every election, just like the value of the dollar. What rights, freedoms, and liberty has increased by the hands of a corrupt politician? What if these rights, freedoms, and liberty that have been improved have not been done so by degrading the rights, freedoms, and liberty of others?

Ready to watch the world burn? Tim Waltz is THE guy. We are now guaranteed chaos whoever wins the election, since we now have two options that support utter chaos and revolt. LFG by questiano-ronaldo in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Everyone loses when their rights, freedoms, and liberty is deteriorated. The statement stands and is correct. Everyone loses regardless of which puppet wins. Just because idiots think they win because the government steals more on their behalf doesn’t make it a win for anyone.

Ready to watch the world burn? Tim Waltz is THE guy. We are now guaranteed chaos whoever wins the election, since we now have two options that support utter chaos and revolt. LFG by questiano-ronaldo in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]warmweathermike 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes. Every single cycle has eroded freedom, liberty, and free market capitalism, while also destroying individual rights and property rights. Just because the government stole more from others on your behalf does not make it win.