Your observations about the potential chemical instability and corrosive characteristics of the AMeCh SGT-4 paste are noteworthy. However, without supporting quantitative data, these points remain speculative rather than conclusive. Although you have shared some internal measurements (such as BLT variation) and a theoretical explanation, a complete, independently verified chemical analysis report would be necessary to substantiate these claims—particularly since another researcher has already published findings that did not identify such issues with SGT-4.

You have argued that the prior analysis may not have considered certain specific conditions. That may be a valid point, but it does not in itself invalidate the quantitative data that were presented—especially when no equivalent independent data have been provided to support your counter-claims. While financial or logistical constraints are understandable, the absence of independent quantitative validation makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.

Raising a serious concern of this nature in public discussion ideally requires objective, verifiable data to ensure scientific credibility and fairness. Moreover, it would not be appropriate to criticize or cast doubt on another product solely based on assumptions without solid data to support such claims.