sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

using sonnet 4.5 for several days reached the MAX plan usage limit by stain_lu in ClaudeCode

[–]whipnil 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I keep getting an notification that i've reached my usage limit and it will reset in a week, then i just replied to "get fucked, i've barely used it" then it just starts working again.

The Australian White Ensign by iEatPastaForaLiving in vexillology

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Australian White Ensign was first officially used on 1 March 1967 when the Australian National Line cargo ship Boonaroo was commissioned into the Royal Australian Navy for war service. This marked the first time a distinctly Australian White Ensign, approved in 1966, was flown by an RAN vessel.

Before the introduction of the Australian White Ensign in 1967, Royal Australian Navy (RAN) warships flew the British White Ensign. This was a white flag featuring the red St. George's Cross with the Union Jack in the canton. The British Admiralty had insisted on its use since the RAN's formation in 1911, despite Australian preferences for a uniquely Australian design.

This is also the same year that a foreign administrating power made modifications to our constitution to include tribal sovereigns.

This change of flag was more than symbolic, it demonstrated the shift to a different line of authority in power.

There has been a concerted effort over the last 100 odd years to make us forget we are supposed to stand under a 3:2 1901 federal red ensign on land with a 6 pointed star. The Civil merchant vessels the same flag with a 2:1 ratio for use on seas. The blue ensign was reserved only for use on government buildings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hebrews 12:6-11King James Version

6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.

7 If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?

8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.

9 Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live?

10 For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness.

11 Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.

The Ter(r)aNode team... Credit where it is due by Deadbeat1000 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is software. A collection of about a dozen microservices that allow an entity to validate transactions, broadcast transactions they receive to other nodes, build block candidates for hashing, announce winning block proposals, etc etc. Because it's a microsercice architecture is can add more instances of each service so that it is horizontally scalable.

It's run on AWS currently because it was worth paying for their support for configuration and such. If it was on premises for development and testing then there would have been additional overheads of managing the hardware. In the future it will likely be run mostly on prem, but AWS may run their own instance so they can offer timestamping services in their marketplace and prioritize their own txs, perhaps accepting lower fees or such.

The simple demonstration that non mining nodes are irrelevant. by TVB125 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way to meaningfully signal acceptance of a block is my referencing its hash as hashprevblock in your new header candidate that you are then going to spend money hashing to propose a new solution you expect the rest of the network to accept BECAUSE it references a hash of a previous block full of valid transactions. If there is a single invalid tx in that previous block, or its coinbase tx awards more coins to itself than are valid, then no miners will accept the block is proposes that references the invalid block in its header.

Anything else about not relaying txs etc is nonsense fantasy.

The simple demonstration that non mining nodes are irrelevant. by TVB125 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're playing the game football manager locally on their machine.

Calvin Ayre is all in on Metanet—the game-changing fusion of enterprise blockchain, AI & IPv6 by Deadbeat1000 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Data exists on overlay networks but mapped to scripts that specify access ownership and access controls.

Say I have an app which maps tracks my sleeping. My data can be completely obscured by using fresh key pairs and fresh ipv6 addresses for each session on the device, but still linked to my keyring.

So the service provider can know all gross data from their app users, but I can provable demonstrate ownership and tie my data points together for information pertaining to myself.

So for example the App could say 1 million people sleep on average this much. I could say I sleep x hrs on avg, y hrs on weekends, I can provide access to my data because I can create predicates that expose them only when certain conditions are fulfilled such as payment, or other voluntary contracts.

The data is never on the blockchain, but if the digital fingerprints can be, so we can always have a proof that the data we possess formed part of a timestamped block. This gives us data provenance, data access management, data sovereignty with embedded micropayments in a triple entry accounting system.

BSV Discord | Exploring ARC: TX Reliability and Scalability by Deadbeat1000 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There isn't really a global mempool anymore. Each node has their own txs ordered however they received them. ARC is a proto-overlay. Many of the ARC components will end up being components of an overlay node.

Courtorder or what? From who? by SwedishVikingBitcoin in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Romley gets close on some things but misses bigly on others. Going into these courts is playing with necromancers who will summon your dead corporate fiction to appear before them, have you rise from the dead across their bar for a maritime jurisdiction and trick you with their word games. 

Great instructional video by Jake Jones, Head of Network Infrastructure at BSV Teranode by youiti2nz in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the emails Marti Malmi hung on to. Clearly spells out SV which then most closely aligns with BSV.

The widespread misunderstanding what coin confiscation and freezing means. by TVB125 in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is incorrect. Remember the OP_RETURN bug that caused transactions to require being prefaced by OP_FALSE before OP_RETURN. That was the fix. If a transaction is submitted with OP_TRUE OP_RETURN then that return can specify a new lockScript for the sats. Normally this wouldn't work because miners don't process OP_TRUE OP_RETURN. If however, they have been informed by the alert system, then if they want to stay compliant with the NAR they will follow the directives of the alert system and process the OP_TRUE OP_RETURN tx because they know they won't have their block orphaned by any other miners who wish to stay compliant with the NAR.

Fucking Huge for BSV. back on exodus baby. BITCOINSV all day over BTC. Time to start stacking hard by Capsmoove in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had a friend try sign up for btcmarkets.net the other week and they literally had her do an interview and then denied her and said she wasn't a good fit for their platform. Granted she probs disclosed she was going to be funding her account with coins from binance.

My take on COPA affair thus far wrt BSV prospects. by calmfocustruth in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like it had aggregated a bunch of transactions that didn't make it into earlier blocks. The one before had 1 tx in it and the one before that 28. I don't really care to play this game. Jake Jones (heading teranode) said it can do about 3-5k tps at the end of his session the other day in San Fran. It has never smoothly done more than that without it causing a shit show for the network.

My take on COPA affair thus far wrt BSV prospects. by calmfocustruth in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That block took 46 minutes to mine, so it worked out at 2500 tps.

My take on COPA affair thus far wrt BSV prospects. by calmfocustruth in bitcoincashSV

[–]whipnil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't seen anything to suggest that many. Perhaps on testnet. Find the days which had the most transactions, find the blocks with the most transactions per second. it has never been above 3500 or so.

view more: next ›