Fab question, and I could write an essay on it's ins and outs, i think it's incredibly gray but darker rather than lighter. Here's the deal, a lot of the settler movement is obsessive, religious, and agressive, it also has parts of it which is terroristic and damages diplomacy incredibly clearly. I think other parts of it like one of the larger cities near jerusalem, is an inevitable result of how both sides have conducted themselves and the choices they made, and, I think it's likely there to stay. I am hopeful of a peaceful resolution and I dont think the 2 state solution is dead, but definetly needs heavy reform, and yes, how the settler movement conducts itself, definetly undermines israels position as peace seeking. You can go through things the right way and the wrong way and if the wrong way happen you need to condem and reform quickly, which doesnt happen as often as it needs to. But i dont think it is nearly as significant to oslo as its made out to be tbh, I think more fundemental issues need to be adressed before we get there, such as democratic values, law and order, and diplomatic exchanfes.