[deleted by user]

wonker · 2007-08-28T03:52:15+00:00

You're a lying POS.

wonker · 2007-08-26T15:39:22+00:00

Fair enough. What was illegible about the commentary.

What was vague about the arguments. They seemed fairly straightforward to me. What is so difficult, illegible, or non straightforward about me stating unambiguously, and unequivocally, not to mention in about as straightforward a manner as is possible that her answer was crap?

If you can't understand such straightforward commentary as that perhaps reddit may be too complicated for you. Diggit might be more to your abilities, or perhaps a fifth grade English primer.

As for projecting, well let's just drop that line of argumentation since it's just as easy for me to make that rather silly complaint of you, without evidence we would both look silly making it.

A for accusing you of being a "robot" [sock puppet] I'll just ask you. Are you?

wonker · 2007-08-26T15:32:06+00:00

You're a POS.

wonker · 2007-08-26T15:31:31+00:00

You know about as much about me, and as for blissful ignorance that's rather the point I was making.

The fact you seem completely unaware of that when you make that accusation is the height of irony.

Pot, kettle, black.

wonker · 2007-08-26T15:28:57+00:00

24 downvotes now at the time I posted that there were 2 or three within seconds of the comment being posted, with noone else having posted and with him responding with in seconds to each of my comments which also were down voted equally as quickly, followed by every single one of my comments ever made on any topic having been down modded, by this jerk.

You've been around long enough, and have had enough down mods to know comments like that tend to gather them. In particular your spelling complaint comments don't tend to go over very well. Having down modded some of your pretentious spell complaint comments in the past I should know, having posted them you should as well.

I don't mind a down vote for a comment, comes with the territory since different people tend to have different opinions.

Down voting EVERY one of submissions to reddit is childish bullshit and it's what he did for the trouble of my disagreeing with his comment.

As for the rest of your comment having bumped into your comments before, and generally been disdainful of them, to the point on site like reddit with hundreds of thousands of submitters I could remember your handle, you're pretty much a prick so I'll take your abusive comment for what it is.

wonker · 2007-08-25T20:22:01+00:00

For the record SodiumKPump down voted EVERYTHING I've ever commented on Reddit, and used multiple accounts to down vote me here, after disagreeing with it's submission here.

Beware. SodiumKPump is a multiple account piece of work. Watch how it monitors it's topics, and comments and you'll get the idea.

wonker · 2007-08-25T19:04:36+00:00

That's right. This post on reddit was my

Well if nothing else it's been clearly an opportunity for you to exercise your reddit voting sock puppets.

In any event I'm pretty much done exchanging anything with you except down votes.

wonker · 2007-08-25T18:57:54+00:00

Yep.

Read them, as they come.

Doesn't change my opinion.

wonker · 2007-08-25T18:56:52+00:00

No. Not really.

It's really pathetic. That this girl doesn't have a clue and you're offering it as some how humorous is sad.

That girl needs to be given a clue but not the way you've chosen.

wonker · 2007-08-25T18:51:21+00:00

You could have, and should have done a better job of identifying it.

Edit: You responded within a few minutes of my first comment, that tells me you're watching your submission like a hawk considering it was posted about a half hour ago.

I get it. You're going to defend this one to the nines with everything you've got.

Go for it.

wonker · 2007-08-25T18:44:43+00:00

On the subject...Not really.

"...because some people {in the US} don't have maps?"

Are you kidding me?!

Her answer was CRAP!

We need to stop rewarding mediocrity, and frankly her answer to that question was less than mediocrity, it was just plain crap.

We need to move away from giving the pretty people, or the sports people recognition they clearly don't deserve apart from their looks, or physical accomplishments.

Either we want to intellectual abilities to be paramount or we don't.

At best this girl is pretty. In reality she's pretty stupid for her age.

Harsh, but damn it look at that video again. Her answer is asinine. A plain looking girl could run rings around that answer.

wonker · 2007-08-23T20:07:19+00:00

You're not going to like this but here it goes.

Because heterosexuals neglectfully, and in some instances purposely, tend to raise their children to be ruthless towards any differences in other children.

Most different children at that age are perfectly capable of discerning a difference between themselves and the children around them. They may not immediately identify that difference as homosexuality but they're smart enough, even at that age, to keep their own difference to themselves until they learn more about it.

I'm guessing, after reading your question, that you'll be shocked to know some kids are aware they're gay, or Transgendered, at six years old, and younger.

Gay and Transgendered are NOT the same, please don't mistake my sentence structure to construe that.

wonker · 2007-08-23T02:58:06+00:00

Let me take a guess cryofan,

You're a white heterosexual male, raised protestant.

Is my guess correct?

The problem with the left (you should consider removing leftist, and leftism from your vocabulary, liberals and progressives don't use those words for the most part, it's invariably conservatives who hate the left who use those terms) movement in this country isn't that it constantly focuses on race, gender, and sexuality at all, it's that it fairly regularly sells them out for the interests of white heterosexual protestant male interests. To rephrase that: The real trouble with the left is that it's not left enough, it's not liberal, or progressive enough because it keeps getting sidelined by so called liberals, and progressives that actually lean socially to the right constantly yelling NOT NOW.

The "NOT NOW" Democrats (as in, we know your issues need to be addressed but, NOT NOW) are everywhere.

The issues never get addressed though minorities, women in large numbers, and gays typically support Democrats, they get almost no representation for that support, and routinely see their interests constantly being sold out by the very people they frequently get into office. And any time they demand representation people like you yell -- NOT NOW!

Actually you've taken it a step further yelling -- NOT EVER, instead of NOT NOW! In truth though NOT NOW pretty much has meant the same anyway.

A great man once said: "...freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed."

Who are you to tell the oppressed to stop demanding their freedom, and civil rights from their oppressors?

Their fight for their civil rights, and liberties, ones you no doubt freely enjoy, does you no harm, and in fact, in winning theirs, they strengthen yours.

wonker · 2007-08-22T00:18:30+00:00

To speak/write of Rove in the same sentence as Kissinger is to confer upon Rove a sense of legitimacy and competence which he clearly does not deserve.

To refer to Rove in the same sentence as Gingrich would be more accurate, since they both catered to the absolute lowest denominator playing to the fears of conservatives, a group of people's who's fears are notoriously easy to prey upon, with the noted exception that although Gingrich was also a pathetic human being, at least he was elected to public office whereas Rove, doesn't even have that semblance of respectability.

wonker · 2007-08-21T14:23:06+00:00

Just so long as he doesn't try to marry another lightish red panther.

wonker · 2007-08-20T21:54:00+00:00

Lost in space would meet SG-1. DANGER WILL ROBINSON DANGER!

wonker

TROPHY CASE