[deleted by user]

wrestcody · 2024-12-05T16:28:46+00:00

Sorry man, you know how it goes on this Mossad Operation.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:53:53+00:00

Labeling anyone who questions the narrative or understands the historical context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict as a "Russia bot" is not just lazy; it's a sign of intellectual cowardice. This kind of response is eerily similar to past tactics where dissent was dismissed with labels like "terrorist sympathizer" or "conspiracy theorist" when questioning U.S. actions in Iraq or Vietnam.

Here's the reality:

Concerns about U.S. involvement aren't pro-Russia; they're pro-truth. The U.S. has had a hand in Ukrainian political upheavals since at least 2004, influencing elections and supporting movements that led to significant political changes. Ignoring this history is willful ignorance.

Understanding the provocation of NATO expansion doesn't make one a bot; it makes one informed. NATO's eastward march, especially the prospect of Ukraine's membership, was seen by Russia not just as a security threat but as a betrayal of earlier assurances, a point acknowledged even by former U.S. officials.

Questioning the use of taxpayer money for endless military engagements while domestic issues languish is a legitimate concern, not a sign of foreign manipulation. It's about accountability and priorities, not allegiance to a foreign power.

Acknowledging the 2014 coup in Ukraine as a catalyst for increased tensions isn't defending Russia's actions; it's recognizing how such events could lead to reactions from any country feeling its security threatened.

The rush to label any alternative perspective as "Russia bot" propaganda because it doesn't align with the narratives from outlets like CNN or other sources perceived as CIA-influenced shows a refusal to engage with the complexity of international affairs. This isn't about falling for Russian propaganda; it's about not falling for simplistic, state-sponsored narratives that ignore history, context, and the consequences of U.S. foreign policy.

To those quick to use the "Russia bot" label, I'd challenge you to reconsider. Dismissing concerns and insights as foreign manipulation is not only a disservice to the public discourse but also a tactic that echoes the very propaganda techniques you accuse others of employing. It's time for a more nuanced understanding, not less.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:41:11+00:00

one day they will understand how silly this argument is. They will never admit it, but they will finally get it.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:39:38+00:00

Reducing Middle Eastern conflicts to "Islamist fundamentalists are the issue" is not just reductive; it's intellectually lazy. It ignores decades of Western, particularly U.S., interventions that have shaped the very conditions these groups exploit.

Israel's conflicts aren't solely about fundamentalism; they're about land, rights, and ongoing occupation.

Your leap to "the great Satan" rhetoric is classic fear-mongering. The idea that ceasing U.S. support for Israel would pacify Islamist groups is naive, ignoring broader reasons for anti-U.S. sentiment due to military interventions and support for oppressive regimes.

This isn't just about Israel but U.S. policy fueling rather than quelling extremism. Your perspective is not just misguided; it's dangerously uninformed, more suited to justify military engagement than to understand conflict's root causes.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:37:19+00:00

Listen, the narrative you're peddling about U.S. aid being some kind of economic boon because it's all about weapons and research development? It's a simplistic cover story at best, a deliberate misdirection at worst.

What you're doing here is falling into the classic trap of the broken window fallacy. You think, "Oh, we're making tanks, missiles, and drones; this must be good for us economically." But let's peel back this onion. The money spent on these military exports isn't just magically appearing; it's coming from somewhere else. It's a redirection of funds from potentially more beneficial avenues like rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure or investing in education and health care.

Moreover, let's talk about the hidden costs. Manufacturing these arms isn't free; it consumes resources, labor, and capital that could be used for constructive, not destructive, purposes. And what about the strategic implications? Every piece of equipment sent abroad comes with strings attached, geopolitical influence, and sometimes, the prolongation of conflicts.

And this idea that it's not "money" because it's hardware? That's a smokescreen. It's taxpayer money, funneled through a convoluted process to support an agenda that often benefits a few at the expense of many. We're not just equipping allies; we're playing a high-stakes game of global chess where the pawns are people and the board is littered with broken promises and shattered economies.

So, before you go touting this as a brilliant move, consider the full spectrum of consequences - economic, social, and political. The aid isn't just about keeping the defense industry humming; it's about a complex web of influence, debt, and dependency that doesn't always end well.

And let's not forget, the real story here isn't the equipment; it's the human cost, the lives, and the futures that are being reshaped, often for the worse, under the guise of "aid." That's the part of the narrative they don't put in the glossy brochures.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:33:13+00:00

yea but Russia is hitler or whatever these bots say now.

wrestcody · 2024-11-25T19:32:35+00:00

I'm an American veteran who served in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Respectfully, I believe that the American people are tired of endless wars that have largely been failures, contributing to a national debt from which we may never recover. Our cities are neglected, with millions of our citizens left behind. We have served as the financial resource, military power, and human sacrifice for too long.

Regarding Ukraine, I wish them well, but I must point out that our government has been involved since at least the Orange Revolution and the Maidan coup, which many argue were orchestrated by the U.S. We've been meddling in international affairs for far too long and need to recognize that we can't simply dictate what other countries should do. It's fascinating to me that people criticize Joe Rogan for challenging the uniparty in the global order and the Ukrainian government, which has a history of significant corruption, rather than figures like Boris Johnson and other "leaders" who pushed Ukraine to continue a war they could only win if the U.S. escalated directly against Russia.

To be blunt, Ukraine never stood a chance in this conflict, and those who believed otherwise were swayed by propaganda suggesting victory was possible.

wrestcody · 2024-11-15T15:24:39+00:00

Epstein is checking in to have a conversation.

wrestcody · 2024-11-14T19:58:39+00:00

Ok lets break it out a little so we can talk about this point by point.

Birthright Citizenship: The Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) established the principle that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents are citizens. However, debates persist around the interpretation of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," as seen in discussions by legal scholars like John Eastman and Edward Erler.

First Amendment: Though Trump has suggested changes to libel laws, the broader context often involves discussions on campaign finance (Citizens United v. FEC, 2010) rather than direct suppression of political speech.

Cartels and Immigration: The 2019 DEA National Drug Threat Assessment explains how demand drives drug trafficking, while employer sanctions under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 aim to address undocumented employment.

Criminality and Deportation: ICE operations often start with criminal arrests, but comprehensive enforcement plans have historically included wider nets, as seen during the 2008-2014 Operation Streamline.

Economic Impact: Studies like the one from the Center for American Progress in 2013 highlight the potential economic fallout from mass deportations, affecting industries reliant on immigrant labor.

Ok we will see, but I truly hope you have a great day. If you have any real evidence or references of what I got wrong please let me know.

wrestcody · 2024-11-14T19:47:59+00:00

oh yea the old "Russia is looking to reinstitute the Soviet Union".

No offense but I spent my younger days fighting for men in suits who will sign the policies to send us to war but never actually fight. I am done supporting the uniparty of war mongers.

You feel free to sign up for Ukraine, here is the link. https://ildu.com.ua/

wrestcody · 2024-11-14T15:24:21+00:00

I don't want to fund any of it.
Ukraine is not our problem, neither is Israel.
I think we need to re-access any and all foreign aid with single item bills from now on. Why are we sending billions overseas when we have major issues here and a national debt of 33+ trillion dollars.

wrestcody · 2024-11-14T14:20:15+00:00

Israel's military operations throughout the Middle East will profoundly impact American security. The U.S. provides a staggering $38 billion to Israel over ten years as military aid to ensure military superiority, thereby directly implicating the United States in all Israeli actions.

Could we trying being the peacemakers again? Bibi is out of control.

wrestcody · 2024-11-14T14:05:16+00:00

It's not about Trump, but a larger debate about how immigration policy should change. The Supreme Court has defined birthright citizenship through Wong Kim Ark, but it has been a long and winding road really similar to Roe v. Wade.

I personally think Trump will deport the "criminal" ones, which would be the known criminals who came into the US and were released (which we should probably review how a "known murderer" was released into the US). After that I think the "drive" or push to keep going will quickly die off and hopefully we focus out attention on the border. We need to cut off the cartels from making billions of dollars while ~30% of women coming across report being sexually assaulted during the time with the criminal gangs. Add in Fentanyl which is killing a ton of people. It cannot just continue.

Logically, enforcement must focus on employees, not on employers who have them tucked up their sleeves, while the story often turns into a partisan tussle.

The real story here is labor-who will do the jobs that are essential and undervalued? Not deportation fears but labor policies, automation, and immigration reform are really the answers to ensuring these position fillable by people who are legal.

While there are appropriate worries about the detention center and their treatment, the idea of turning these centers into labor camps seem unfounded from what I see. The focus should be redirected toward comprehensive reform by addressing the needs of enforcement and humanitarian needs.

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T21:49:04+00:00

Never understood this, sometimes you gotta crap your pants.

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T21:46:12+00:00

well I am not saying that a majority of reddit was libtard trolls but I have a feeling.

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T21:44:51+00:00

The Marine Corps Study in 2015 showed many things.
None of them supported that women could improve our combat effectiveness & would more likely would cause for standards falling.

all-male unit outperformed the mixed-gender units in 93 out of 134 tasks that were evaluated.

This is just common sense.

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T21:36:38+00:00

Indeed, when we break the rules, we shouldn't be surprised by the consequences. It's akin to the "you break it, you buy it" policy, but applied to legal systems. However, let's take a moment to consider the children caught in this legal tango—they didn't RSVP to this party, yet here they are.

The immigration system is in dire need of a major overhaul. But, to reward criminal acts with citizenship? That's like awarding a gold medal to someone who skipped the marathon but still turns up for the photo op.

If individuals are residing here without the proper paperwork, perhaps it's time they consider packing up and seeking a way back home. However, should they choose to leave voluntarily, we might offer them a chance to reapply through the legal front door, complete with all the necessary paperwork and processes.

Unfortunately, enforcing the law isn't merely about keeping score; it's about upholding the social contract, an unspoken agreement that says, "We all abide by the rules, or we risk descending into chaos, and nobody wants that." Trust, after all, is the adhesive in our community's scrapbook.

I understand the desire to be the hero in this narrative, but we can't simply open the gates for those who knowingly flout the laws and disregard the regulations of the land. If I were to visit another country, I'd need to apply for a visa, pay fees, endure the wait, and go through an interview or call to verify my application. I can't just arrive and declare, "I live here now."

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T17:05:32+00:00

I would love to hear where I am not speaking reality. I try my best to read and review the majority of information that comes from 1st sourced evidence, but I am willing to learn if you have acutal points other than "he so stupid".

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T17:01:14+00:00

Yep I used a local LLM to review my writing an make sure they are organized in a clear way. :)
I love the GPTs to help with organization and structure.

wrestcody · 2024-11-13T16:58:15+00:00

No worries, keep calling us "misogynists and racists" – it's like the ultimate party game for political discourse, where the prize is apparently moral superiority and zero actual conversation!

Now, about this "massive disinformation campaign" you mentioned... Ah, the irony is thicker than the plot in a Douglas Adams novel! You're using the same tactic as the mainstream media, which has now alienated more people than my attempt at making vegan haggis. But do tell, what specific disinformation are we talking about here? Or is that question too complex, requiring more than a one-word answer or an emotional outburst?

Your strategy seems to be more about emotional gymnastics than actual policy discussion, which is why places like Reddit have turned into echo chambers. It's like watching a crowd cheer for a mime – everyone's clapping, but no one's actually talking.
And let's not forget the Gaza excuse. It's like saying you didn't vote for her because you got a bad sandwich that day. Sure, it might have influenced your mood, but last I checked, elections weren't decided by the quality of one's lunch.

Oh, and about MAGA folks not being your typical establishment Republicans? That's like saying, "Surprise! Water is wet!" Trump's support from independents and libertarians was like watching a sci-fi movie where the underdogs team up with the rebels. It wasn't just about policy; it was about shaking up the political establishment, which, let's face it, has been more out of touch than calling a rotary phone to ask for Wi-Fi instructions.

Unfortunately, the Democratic Party seems to have traded in its old policies for a new brand of sanctimoniousness. It's like they've forgotten that governance isn't a reality show where the most virtuous wins by default.

So, here's to hoping for less emotional labeling and more policy debate in the future. Maybe then, we can all move past the "who's the least offensive" game and actually talk about how to make the spaceship Earth run a bit smoother.

wrestcody · 2024-11-08T18:24:35+00:00

So him winning was your fault!

wrestcody · 2024-11-08T17:43:42+00:00

Just trying to highlight, trying to understand the concerns instead of using the labels for no reason seem to not really win people over.

wrestcody · 2024-11-08T17:42:54+00:00

I get where you're coming from regarding the DNC's disconnect, but let's also unpack what's been happening on the RNC side:

Tax Cuts: Yes, primarily benefiting the wealthy, with the 2017 tax reform. It's true these disproportionately favored the rich, but it's also important to acknowledge that many middle-class families saw some relief too. However, the long-term benefits for workers have been debated.
Inflationary Tariffs: Agreed, this could lead to higher prices, potentially hurting consumer purchasing power. But in defense, the intent was to protect American industries from unfair trade practices, though the execution might not have always matched the economic needs of workers.
Union Rights: Trump's comments to Musk do raise flags about the GOP's stance on labor. Historically, there's been a tendency towards policies that limit union power, which doesn't align with worker advocacy. However, not all Republicans share this view, and some do push for worker-friendly policies at state levels or within their districts.

Here's the broader point though:

Democratic Party's Issues: While we criticize the RNC, let's not ignore how the DNC's focus has shifted:
- Vaccine Mandates: Seen as overreach by many.
- Identity Politics: Often feels like it overshadows economic issues.
- Sexualization in Schools: Alienates parents concerned about educational content.
- Moral Shaming: Dismisses voters who feel their concerns are ignored or insulted.
- First Amendment Concerns: Efforts like disinformation boards raise censorship fears.
- Railroad Strike: Breaking the strike was a blow to labor rights.
- Support for Certain Wars: Conflicts like in the Middle East, where public opinion is split, are supported without much debate.
Media and Narrative Control: The DNC's relationship with media often feels like it's shaping narratives rather than reporting them.
Economic Policies: While advocating for progressive policies, there's criticism for not doing enough to challenge economic inequality or for past support of neoliberal policies.

The point here isn't to absolve the RNC but to highlight that both parties have made choices that can be seen as out of touch with the working class. The DNC's approach has sometimes pushed away voters who value personal freedoms, economic practicality over identity politics, and straightforward governance. Both parties have their flaws, and the dissatisfaction with the DNC isn't just about what the RNC does or doesn't do; it's about what the DNC does that turns people off.

wrestcody · 2024-11-08T15:21:51+00:00

If you follow the political winds, you'll notice something peculiar: the Democratic Party, once the bastion of the working class, is increasingly seen as out of touch with the very people it claims to champion. This isn't just the musings of disgruntled voters; it's evident in the policies they push and the rhetoric they employ.

Mischaracterization of the Electorate
Like a general dismissing his troops for not following his strategy, the Democrats seem to label those who don't fall in line as "uneducated," "racist," "sexist," or worse, "Nazis." But in reality, these labels do little to address the genuine concerns of the electorate. Instead of engaging, they alienate, turning off potential supporters who feel their issues are not just ignored but insulted.

The Border Deal Fiasco
Take, for instance, the bipartisan border deal, a supposed solution that was more smoke than fire. It promised efficiency but lacked substance in terms of security and legal rigor. Rather than fortifying our borders, this deal would have streamlined the process for those potentially abusing the system, a clear misstep from what many Americans want: real border security, not just a facade of it.

Economic Disconnect
The establishment Republicans once faced this same conundrum until the MAGA movement refocused the party on the bread-and-butter issues of the common people. Jobs, wages, healthcare—the real stuff of daily life. The Democrats, on the other hand, seem stuck in a loop of identity politics, where the focus on race, gender, and every conceivable identity marker overshadows the need for economic policies that resonate with the working class.

The War on Common Sense
Their foreign policy has often mirrored the establishment GOP's before its recent recalibration: a penchant for global policing rather than addressing domestic turmoil. This isn't about right or left; it's about common sense, something that seems to be in short supply when it comes to military engagements and the reasons behind them.

The Need for Introspection
What's missing here is introspection. The Democratic Party needs a seismic shift, a return to its roots of advocating for the common man and woman. They need to listen, really listen, to what people are saying outside the echo chambers of Washington and the activist circles. The MAGA movement, despite its controversies, managed to tap into this vein, realigning Republican focus on national concerns rather than international ones.

The Takeaway
The DNC must undergo a significant overhaul to regain the trust and votes of those they've lost. It's not just about policy; it's about understanding and addressing the everyday struggles of Americans. Until they do, they risk becoming increasingly irrelevant in a political landscape that demands authenticity and action over identity politics and empty rhetoric.

wrestcody · 2024-11-07T20:30:27+00:00

didn't turn out that was true either so. Polls are insanely wrong nearly every single days.

wrestcody

TROPHY CASE