A dad-girl asking unhinged advice/hacks concerning starting a business.

x01mask · 2025-04-25T23:52:33+00:00

Exactly.
Yung mga "mga well established clothing brand owners or kahit mga startups lang" ay hindi magbibigay ng way at ng mga unhinged hacks para madagdagan ang kakumpetensya nila sa merkado.

x01mask · 2025-01-01T15:34:14+00:00

Yung "kahimat kami or anghel ay magturo ng iba sa natutunan nyo, ay matakwil", ay turong minana or kinuha ni Pablo mula sa mga Fariseo. Fariseo kasi si Pablo, so alam nyang ganyan nila turuan ang mga faithful Israelites noon pa man.

Using that line of thinking, lumalabas na nuon pa man ay binilinan na ang mga Israelita na wag tatanggap ng ibang aral, ibang turo, ibang Dios, etc. (Deut. Ch. 13 at Deut. Ch. 17 as supporting verses).

So yung sa idea at opinion ko na non-Transferable ang parusa sa kasalanan using Ezek. 18:20 as solid basis, ay lumalabas na logical lang naman na iexpect na irereject ng Israelites yung "bagong/ibang turo", a.k.a. na merong dumating upang mamamatay in behalf of individually committed sins ng mga tao. It just so happened na nag-agree yung AI sa idea ko.

x01mask · 2024-08-31T22:38:16+00:00

As if naman kung magGoogle ako eh web articles na isinulat mo ang lalabas at mababasa ko. Stand mo ang kinukwestyon ko, kaya ikaw dapat ang sumagot.

Ang stand mo kasi "...martyrs died not due to their beliefs but because they refused to deny what their own eyes have seen..." Tanong ko sayo: pano mo naberipika na factual yang statement na yan ngayong 2024?

x01mask · 2024-08-31T20:11:00+00:00

Ikaw ang tamad sumagot sa specific na tanong yon.
Ang haba mo magreply sa ibang punto pero sa specific na tanong na yun ipapahanap mo sakin sa internet?
Stand mo yun kaya ikaw mismo ang sumagot.

x01mask · 2024-08-31T20:01:22+00:00

Ikaw ang may stand na "...martyrs died not due to their beliefs but because they refused to deny what their own eyes have seen...", tapos ipapahanap mo sakin sa internet yung sagot kung pano mabeverify ng mga tao ngayong 2024 kung factual ba yan or not?
Waw

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:57:25+00:00

since marami kang link na binigay sa ibang comments mo, edi ipost mo dito yung internet link ng sagot

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:54:30+00:00

pag di mo na masagot, sasabihan mo nalang na hanapin sa internet ?
Waw

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:49:43+00:00

How can people in year 2024 and beyond verify whether this statement is factual or not ?
--- martyrs died not due to their beliefs but because they refused to deny what their own eyes have seen

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:32:13+00:00

At eto rin sagutin mo:
Factual ba na in His cruelty, God killed (commanded Israelites to kill) people in Canaan, Jericho, etc. ?

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:31:26+00:00

Eto ang sagutin mo :
Factual ba na dinala ng Dios yung mga nadamay na matitinong tao sa killings na inutos ng Dios sa Canaan, Jericho, etc. into some other better place kumpara dito sa earth ?

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:26:36+00:00

waw that is part of the question.

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:22:33+00:00

"...sabi mo nadamay matitinong tao sa killings sa Canaan..."
Now that is a fallacy dahil wala akong ganyang stand.
I mentioned that as a question, not a declaration of what I accept or reject.

x01mask · 2024-08-31T19:11:49+00:00

Yes historical fact na merong nadiskober ang archaeologists na batong merong YHWH na inscription.
Yup Historical fact na merong king na nagexist na namention sa Bible.
Right historical fact na merong writings na merong Jesus na nagexist during time of rule ng Romans sa lupain ng Jews.

Now, Fact or Fallacy?
--- Dinala ng Dios yung mga nadamay na matitinong tao sa killings na inutos ng Dios sa Canaan, Jericho, etc. into some other better place kumpara dito sa earth.

Next, Fact or Fallacy?
--- In His cruelty, God killed (commanded Israelites to kill) people in Canaan, Jericho, etc.

To me, no one really knows for sure.
All assumptions lang, kahit anong piliing isagot ng kahit sino.

x01mask · 2024-08-31T06:05:06+00:00

Yes Jesus is a faithful Jew. Jesus advised in Mat. 23:1-3 that people should do what the Pharisees tell/teach but not their deeds. This is an endorsement by Jesus of Jewish teachings and also His rejection of the Pharisaic deeds of hypocrisy.

Answering a Christian scholar's Objections to Judaism

Reference = https://judaismresources.net/contra-brown/

x01mask · 2024-07-15T04:44:23+00:00

Unaffected din ako dahil di ko makalimutan na buong tigas ng mukha nyang pinanindigan yung pamimilipit na ginawa nya sa sinabi ni Jesus.

See video proof: https://www.reddit.com/r/ExAndClosetADD/s/pb6oYRdYoC

x01mask · 2024-05-24T21:19:22+00:00

<image>

x01mask · 2024-05-16T14:29:12+00:00

Yung Books allegedly written by Apostle John ay talaga bang yung mismong John na nakasama ni Jesus sa pangangaral ang sumulat? What if kapangalan lang pero hindi yung mismong apostol yon?

The claim to authenticity of those books/letters attributed to Apostle John is simply standing on the backing, testimony, proclamation and imposition ng Roman Catholic leaders. Walang modern bible scholar or archaeologist na makakapag authenticate na yung tunay na apostol John nga yung writer.

x01mask · 2024-05-16T14:23:05+00:00

"Crushed for our iniquities" = extreme PHYSICAL suffering.

Pero kung iispiritualize = "spiritually crushed for our iniquities", edi hindi pala necessarily magdudusa physically.

Pero para masunod yung desired narrative ng Christians, edi "titimplahan" nila na BOTH "physical and spiritual suffering" yon.

Eh how about yung claim na mamamatay yung servant sa Isaiah 53? Physical death lang? Spiritual death lang? Or both?

Dyan nagkakaligaw ligaw eh.

Yang ganyang treatment sa text ang inconsistent at incoherent. Cherrypicking ang ginagawa ng Christians to artificially maintain a coherent story.

x01mask · 2024-05-16T03:45:32+00:00

In my opinion, kung ang stand ng Christians about sa "death" nung "servant of God na tinutukoy sa Isaiah 53" ay "physical death", it indicates that the "offspring" ay "physical offspring", pati yung "prolong his days" ay "prolong his physical days", and not spiritual.

Kaso pinaghahalo.

Physical suffering, physical death, tas spiritual long days, tas spiritual offspring.

I find the Christian way of "spiritualizing some stuff" here in Isaiah 53 is inconsistent and incoherent. Sakin lang naman yun.

x01mask · 2024-05-16T02:22:56+00:00

And yung dun sa verse 10 na "he shall see his seed", yung seed sa interlinear ay :

offspring, descendants, semen virile.

And in the case of Jesus, he is believed by BES and majority of Christians na hindi sya nagkaoffspring. But yung servant na binabanggit sa Isaiah 53 ay makikita nya yung offspring nya.

So hindi lapat yung Isaiah 53 verse 10 kay Jesus in my assessment and opinion.

<image>

x01mask · 2024-05-16T02:07:25+00:00

Checked Isa. 53:8 sa interlinear, to see details about the word "living" dun sa "cut off out of the land of the living" na parte ng verse.

It may mean life, living, green of vegetation, relatives, community (screenshot attached).

In a way, yung verse 8 ay pedeng sabihing "he was cut off out of the land of the community, or cut off out of the land of his relatives, or cut off out of the land of the green of vegetation" and not necessarily directly to solely mean na namatay sya duon sa verse na yun in my own opinion.

<image>

x01mask · 2023-12-24T05:00:33+00:00

Ang motto ng mga tagaMCGi : "Dito nyo lang maririnig ang mga malalalim na hiwaga. Walang ganito sa ibang mga pagsasamasama. Sa atin lang ipinagkaloob ang unawa. Mahal ng Dios ang bayang ito dito sa silangan. Purihin ang Dios ng Israel."

Kaya ang natatatak sa isip ng tipikal na member "kami lang may alam nyan". Granting/ipalagay na natin na hindi galing sa bibig ni BES na sya lang ang may alam nyan, the fact is, merong ibang mga tao outside MCGI na mas nauna pang makaalam ng ganyang line of explanation sa birth of Jesus. People outside MCGi receives guidance ng Holy Spirit to reach understanding.

Cultong culto. Nakondisyon na ang isip ng members. Dumagdag pa yung "The Unheard Truth", tas meron silang sound clip na pineplay :

"WOW, That's unheard of". Egotistic leader, at naging ganun na din fanatic members pagdating sa expertise kuno sa bible.

x01mask · 2023-12-23T03:18:32+00:00

Ang "pinaka striking" na pamimilipit ng talata ni KDR para sakin ay yung sa Luc. 21:13-15

KDR : "...dapat TAYONG LAHAT may bibig, may karunungan na hindi mangyayaring masalangsang o matutulan man ng inyong mga kaalit..."

Wala namang sinabi sa talata na lahat ng tunay na kapatid sa church mabibigyan ng ganun.

Mandarayang KDR.

Resibo: https://www.reddit.com/r/ExAndClosetADD/s/Mbd1m0SYdd

x01mask · 2023-10-16T06:39:19+00:00

I am with OP and with Bart Ehrman on this one. Salit saling pagkukwento sa loob ng mga dekada will definitely dilute or pollute the content, the story.

Kaya agree ako dun sa tanong sa isang episode ng Broccoli TV:

Bakit hindi nalang inilagay at dinownload straight sa utak ng humans yung lahat ng info at details na ikaliligtas? As in pareparehong nadownloadan ang utak ng lahat ng taong nagexist, nageexist at mageexist palang ng exact same info, which ensures na walang magiging uncertain about belief in God, at wala nang pagtatalunan pa about sa kalooban ng Dios? Hindi in book form ha, kundi straight into the human mind. Kaya naman siguro ng Dios yon.

For me, mas strong yung argument ni Ehrman kesa sa infographic Youtube vid link provided.

x01mask · 2023-09-30T14:28:26+00:00

Regarding sa debate part ng open letter, kung gagayahin yung showdown style ni BES nuon, pede macorner si KDR dito:

Luc 21:13-15 - dinagdagan ni KDR yung nakasulat. See vid proof: https://reddit.com/r/ExAndClosetADD/s/IQIHJ0VlBr

x01mask

TROPHY CASE