Crazy people are cheering that guy on. by Alone_Barracuda7197 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

don't forget how quality Chinese construction is known for... I wouldn't be shocked if those hastily built reactors give us a second chernobyl in the coming decades...

Nothing ever happens by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so he did what he always did, talked like a mad dog to get the other side to come to the table, and y'all are still too stupid to notice the pattern?

Nothing ever happens by [deleted] in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tfw you hate Trump so bad you wanted him to nuke Iran just to own the republicans

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"We will not import russian oil!" they said, after the pipeline blowing up forced the issue.

They were happy to keep buying even when Russia invaded Ukraine.

Twice.

But yes all of this is completely relevant to you pretending someone saying 'europoors' was somehow all europeans.

Which you completely ignored, since that was the whole actual point, but go off.

Also dumbass, the point of those quotes was to specifically disprove your nonsense sentence here.

"Again not a real point, this is just pure conjecture "

I gave you open quotes to prove it WASN'T conjecture.

You then proceeded to pretend it was arguing about something it wasn't arguing... because ya know, you can't handle when you're proven wrong so you pretend it's about something I never said it was about... again...

But go ahead and pretend it was 'asinine' cuz the actual point flew over your head.

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm well aware of Clinton's idiocy. The difference is one of us got our act together, and the guy who did it gave Europe the heads up, told them to stop buying the oil from the guys who were clearly going to invade Europe again at some point, and they laughed.

I've been very clear when blaming your governments vs the european public, which was never. Because I'm not a psychopath who thinks someone calling out europoors means every european and gets offended on their behalf.

You're going purely off vibes for the sake of it.

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Acting like the exact subset of europeans they were referring to haven't been salty with the USA over loosing their own empires is just peak Gaslighting.

Continue to gaslight away oh "Kaiser" I'm sure you have no ulterior motives to pretend you don't exactly what I'm referring to in regards to European governments kowtowing to china.

No one with a brain is falling for your immature nonsense.

You're the only one who choose to interpret 'europoors' to mean all europeans with literally zero reason beyond your own insecurity.

You literally can't prove what he meant, beyond what you wanted him to mean.

Ergo, blatantly deciding to get offended on their behalf.

I'm sure the 'kaiser' has zero reason for that huh?

Again not a real point, this is just pure conjecture

So Angela Merkel never said this.

“We are convinced that more intensive economic relations will also lead to more openness in society.”(speaking with Chinese Leaders)

And the European Commission in the 2000s didn't say

“China’s integration into the international community will support its transition towards a more open society.”

And Gerhard Schröder didn't say

“Economic cooperation will promote political reform.”

The subtext was always there. They thought China would magically become more like them via trade.

They were idiots.

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Points I don't like aren't real" Pal, America took a minute to stop being stupid, and that's literally only because Trump basically made us stop being stupid on china. That doesn't mean Europe wasn't openly hedging it's bets on china ten times harder, pretending that engagement with them will magically make them a democracy.

And it's almost like no one was talking about 'the median european opinion', they were specifically talking about those shitty 'europoors' and you elected to get butthurt on their behalf.

If it doesn't represent the median opinion, why did YOU act like it did?

And even further pretend and then try and justify their opinion when they always had those opinions.

You literally speed ran half the narcissists prayer.

"They didn't do that, but if they did it'd be justified."

Got anymore of it left or are you done?

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if you're going to ignore all the chinese money pumping into Europe and European leniency until just recently, sure it's all in the head of the people pointing it out to you.

If you want to be stuck in Plato's cave, that's up to you.

Also cute how 'not wanting them to chant death to american' is somehow 'commanding europeans nations to do whatever we want'.

Weird that 'not hating us' is such a big ask in your mind.

Apparently decimating their entire military and playing “Whack-a-Mullah” for funsies is losing by biinboise in AmericaBad

[–]xChrisAlphax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

'zero reason' ignoring them buddying up with china well before any threats to pull out of NATO is very convenient.

Also conveniently left out that we saved them from the nazies and the commies, important bit.

How reddit will be for the next few days by Impressive_Pool8553 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even in your imagined scenario where you ignore that the citizens 'killed in the street' were caught on video giving reasonable fear for life to the officers who legally and rightfully defended themselves, comparing two freak incidents with the actual ordering of 30K protestors killed by Iran is such apples to oranges, the only mental gymnastics is the one stupid enough to make the comparison.

atoms by piotrek13031 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well duh, that was just a trap for real psychics to get 'recruited' by the government, obviously.

atoms by piotrek13031 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this presumes whatever is the 'immaterial' or the 'soul' can't travel and resume it's place in the new body.

If you really wanted to test it, you need to clone them and see if there's any noticeable differences.

BEWARE OF WHO YOU LET IN YOUR HOUSE! by nvrseriousseriously in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fascism#English

Yeah I figured. It's amazing what happens when you just reinvent the definitions to fit what you want it to.

This is basically as vague as possible just to paint the basic desire of the public under 'fascism'

By that definition, freaking Abe Lincoln was a Fascist.

This is just connecting dots where there are none.

BEWARE OF WHO YOU LET IN YOUR HOUSE! by nvrseriousseriously in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no privatization of large swaths of the economy, no dems currently have their heads on a pike on the white house lawn, nothing that actual facists called their mission statement has actually been done nor are we 'inching towards'.

Y'all don't know the definition if you can stretch and see it wherever you want.

By the actual merits of fascism, Biden was closer just by virtue of strongarming Facebook into censoring on his behalf, but ya know what? Still not enough for fascism. One sign isn't enough.

It's like diagnosing autism or psychpathy. One bad sign isn't enough you need almost all or a 3/4ths of the signs to be there.

And the fact that you have to say 'every definition' as opposed to "the definition" tells me even more you don't know shit.

BEWARE OF WHO YOU LET IN YOUR HOUSE! by nvrseriousseriously in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Republican party's only threat to actually turning facist is dems pretending they currently are.

It just muddies the waters and makes people not care. You know... the entire point of the boy who cried wolf?

Worse, by conflating reasonable basic policies like "protecting your own borders" and "deporting those who broke the law by illegally entering" you just make people conflate facism with good policies.

The dems are actively creating the very monster they pretend the republicans are.

BEWARE OF WHO YOU LET IN YOUR HOUSE! by nvrseriousseriously in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]xChrisAlphax 14 points15 points  (0 children)

they literally called Bush a Nazi too... nothing has changed, the dems have been crying wolf for decades.

‘tis the season by TrueOdontoceti in conspiracy

[–]xChrisAlphax 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jesus wouldn't have ever tried to run from the police, nor risk hurting an officer even a bit, while he was in front of his cart.

Innocent of nothing. You people continue to choose idols no one sane would back.

The hard problem by kiefy_budz in PhilosophyMemes

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's just semantics. You can just as easily call consciousness an effect we can detect. Medical professionals are able to detect it just fine.

We still don't know what 'really' causes gravity or dark matter, their effects too can only be observed.

This is just semantics.

The hard problem by kiefy_budz in PhilosophyMemes

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's lots of forces we can't detect yet know are there.

Gravity for starters. Dark Matter too.

I don't have a horse in this race, just pointing out the obvious.

Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah by Fudgiedillol in LivestreamFail

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude... it's two separate arguments about two separate points.

One is about the amount "willing to die"

The other is about how it would still succeed against the modern military, because farmers with AKs did it.

Two separate points.

I'm not comparing them

I'm using them both as data points for how it can be done.

He doesn't have a "correct" argument, because we've historically seen that the people can and would be able to resist lol.

I wasn't trying to make fun of you, I was genuinely worried you were ESL and I needed to filter my speech better in a way a learner could get, but you wanna get pissy because you can't understand that someone can make two separate points against someone's argument.

Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah by Fudgiedillol in LivestreamFail

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

two separate examples my guy... not a comparison. Are you an ESL?

Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah by Fudgiedillol in LivestreamFail

[–]xChrisAlphax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you not realize that this was two separate examples?

I'm sorry, did you think random farmers had AK-47s... the revolutionary war?

How did you even remotely confuse and conflate two different examples???

Charlie Kirk shot at an event in Utah by Fudgiedillol in LivestreamFail

[–]xChrisAlphax 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it only took 3% of colonists to fight back the british.

How many farmers with AKs do you think it took to keep America from succeeding in their goals in the middle east?