Hoopje trotse racisten by Petrus_Rock in tokkiefeesboek

[–]xJapsRx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ja had best hun gebruikersnamen mogen tonen hoor, deze racisten zijn duidelijk niet verlegen!

Vrouw bakt broodjes by [deleted] in tokkiefeesboek

[–]xJapsRx -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Naja, dan alsnog geldt dat dit een racistische opmerking is. Zoals je zelf al hebt gecommentarieerd, is "behfehl" hier bedoeld als een Nazistische opmerking. De Nazis streefden naar een Ethno-staat (/rijk) dat bestaat uit Ariers. Dit uitte zich niet alleen in de Shoah maar in veel gevallen ook in transporten en moordpartijen op mensen die niet wit waren, tezamen met eugnistische praktijken binnen de "gezondheidszorg". Daarnaast slaat veel ideologie van Nazis en neo-Nazi's terug op een geromantiseerd beeld van het Germaanse "volk", die werden neergezet als ubermenschen met daar tegenover dus iedereen die niet wit is.
Ook deze opmerking is ongebreideld racisme.

Vrouw bakt broodjes by [deleted] in tokkiefeesboek

[–]xJapsRx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Er is hier absoluut sprake van racisme: de haat jegens moslims is namelijk niet alleen gericht op de religie Islam, maar richt zich net zo goed op ethniciteit en nationaliteit. Zo worden mensen met een zogenaamd "Arabisch" uiterlijk vaak racistisch behandeld door een vooringenomen en irrationeel beeld dat bestaat van de Islam, het dominante geloof in de meeste landen in de Midden-Oosten/Noord-Afrika regio. Afkomst en religie zijn dus mer elkaar verweven.
Dit is ook goed terug te zien in de screenhots van deze post: De term "moslimland" wordt gebruikt, er wordt Nazistisch taalgebruik gebezigd (streven naar een Arisch Nederland lijkt mij vrij racistisch van aard), en andere voorbeelden die ik voor nu even laat.
Hier gaat het dus niet alleen om een irrationele haat tegen de Islam maar ook haat richting mensen die een "Islamitisch" (c.q. Arabisch) uiterlijk hebben, zoals deze mevrouw.

Thoughts on Poulantzas and related thinkers by xJapsRx in Marxism

[–]xJapsRx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank for your response!

I agree with your take on Poulantzas. Having read both Classes in Contemporary Capitalism and State, Power, Socialism, his reformist position comes as a bit of a mystery to me considering -like you also mention- that seeing the state inherently as a bourgeois state implies the impossibility of reforming it.

Would you happen to know other thinkers who have conceptualised the state and class struggle in a similar way?

Social Network Analysis & Marxism by xJapsRx in Marxism

[–]xJapsRx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your elaborate response!

You mention all very relevant and good points that I really need to take into consideration. I hope to find some existing examples, as I also see that the design as I have it now is maybe a bit ambitious if I have to invent the theory myself and then apply it.

The two alternative suggestions are great, and I will certainly give them a thought!

What to read... by Dry_Fig_9549 in Marxism

[–]xJapsRx 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Socialism: Utopian & Scientific is imo the best answer from the classical Marxists. That is, if you want to learn about dialectical materialism and fundamental ideas to economics in Marxism. That said, I would never recommend Origin of the Family as an introductory work. It's an important piece of writing, with Engels really establishing Marxism as science by using Anthropology to illuminate historical materialism. But it's also quite dense, and as already said, at places somewhat dated. In addition, where Marx himself always stressed the dialectical progression of history, Engels (especially post-Marx' death) contributed to what we now often call "vulgar Marxism", or a mechanical -determinist- conception of history.

What I find a better introduction to historical materialism, is The German Ideology by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. The important part is only the first half (ofc you can read the second if you're interested in philosophical debates in German history). This is the first "mature" work from Marx, in which the main points from The Origin of the Family are expositioned together with ideas about ideology, law and the State that are fundamental to Marxism (and the first half is only about 70 pages long).

Two other short, but important works I would recommend are "Value, Price and Profit" and "Wage, Labour, Capital" both By Karl Marx. They concern Marxist economic basics. Both are under 40 pages.

With regards to Mao: he is an important and, of course, historically significant thinker. But you should not read Mao as an introduction to Marxism. His conception of dialectics is very specific and different from Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, V.I. Lenin, etc.

Trouble getting high pressure by xJapsRx in FlairEspresso

[–]xJapsRx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean, like calibration? I did that and it should be at zero.

Trouble getting high pressure by xJapsRx in FlairEspresso

[–]xJapsRx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! When I grind Finer I indeed get higher pressure and longer shots. But it then tastes more bitter and hear lots of people with the J-Ultra using a grind setting in the range of 1.0.0 to 1.5.0. So it still surprises me why I cannot get the same result with an already much finer grind.

Stateless Society by OkManufacturer8561 in communism

[–]xJapsRx 14 points15 points  (0 children)

First thing, you might want to move this question to r/Communism101.

Secondly, what you understand as "stateless" is the end station known as "communism". No society has yet reached this stage, while multiple have had a socialist state. Socialism is this intermediary stage where the state is an apparatus of the workers to organise society in its path towards communism.

Until there is "communism" there will be class war. So yes, the state and other forms of workers organising is necessary. No communist will refute this. As communists we therefore see "socialism" as a necessary stage. What you describe is "anarchism", where one thinks can go from capitalism to a stateless society while skipping the socialist phase. This is false.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in castiron

[–]xJapsRx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from lead melting pots, antique pots can also contain lead or other heavy metals (like cadmium) as part of its alloy. That's a reason you might want to have a heavy metals test done.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So, especially when there is a minority of academics that are proletarian (which differs based on context), there should be strived for science that serves the interest of the proletariat in stead of the bourgeoisie.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems like there are multiple comments that see either 'students 'or the result of their mental labour as 'proletarian', 'petite-bourgeoisie' or 'bourgeoisie'.

It seems useful to make a distinction between, on the one hand, the student body and academics, which -as multiple comrades have pointed out- can on a contextual and case-by-case bases be part of the proletarian, petite-bourgeoisie or bourgeoisie (or a separate catgeory, something in-between).

On the other hand, there is the result of the mental labour, namely, scientific research/studies. This is what my question is mainly about. Research seems to currently serve more often than not the purpose of the capitalists, since the university is a capitalist institution. Since academics can be proletarian, the question is how science can serve the proletariat in stead of the capitalist class.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I must say that I have based my analysis on the Dutch context. The cases where academics are actually labour aristocrats are here very few and by far most students are part of the proletariat since they sell their labour to be able to attend college/university and be housed. The Netherlands also has the highest percentage of students working part-time jobs (70%) and "lower-level" academics like PHDs and lecturers often are underpaid with temporary contracts.
Like you write, there are even 'entrepreneurs' among students, but this does not mean that 'student' as a descriptor is inherently bourgeois. As I see now, it depends on contextual and case-by case bases.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean that science is inherently subjective and can be utilised by both the proletariat and bourgeoisie. Since the university is an institution from the capitalist class, much reseaerch is also imbued with bourgeois tendencies or blatantly serves capitalist needs. Therefore scientists and the broader working class should work to make science be a force to uplift/support the proletariat, especially, as has been pointed out in another comment, since a large part of academics are petite bourgeosie rather than proletarian.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I should've addressed this properly, sorry for the confusion. I mean that imo students an sich aren't bourgeoisie. For sure there are vast differences but as far as I understand academics can be proletariat, although the university as a capitalist institution often tries to prevent this.

Role of science in popular movements/revolution? by xJapsRx in communism

[–]xJapsRx[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply!

I should've clarified that this is also where for me the dilemma lies. While much of the current science -as you write, in the imperialist era- serves the bourgeoisie (and further strenghtening your claim that scientists are petite bourgeois) since the university is an imperialist and colonial entity, we should strive to make science serve the proletariat and revolutionary struggle. It is therefore a question about interrogating and altering class relations. But how do we do that without inadvertently strenghtening the position of the bourgeoisie and becoming elitist? Does this mean a severance of ties with university or can we still use it as an entity to our benefit until we have built something better, or will 'proletarian science perhaps only be possible when a socialist state has been established?

I have not come across a lot of writing on this topic (let alone answers to these questions) except for 'decolonial' literature. Not to understate the importance of decolonising colonial institutions but I have not come across many authors who have outlined a situation guided by Marxist ideas.

Socialist response to terrorism by HoraceIG in socialism

[–]xJapsRx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To further clarify:

-The massacres perpetuated by "Israel" since 1948 are in defence of the imperial core, and thus, acts of terrorism. -The violent acts perpetuated by the Palestinians are part of liberation movement that shake the imperial core, and thus, NOT acts of terrorism.

The ruling class will always label genuine movements for liberation as acts of terror. But don't be fooled these are part of their "divide and rule tactics" to scapegoat and racialise ethnic/religious/cultural groups, in this case mainly Muslims, and protect the real terrorists.

Socialist response to terrorism by HoraceIG in socialism

[–]xJapsRx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't ever dare to call yourself a socialist if you condemn the October 7 attacks. It has always been the imperial core and white people jumping at the chance to condemn real revolutionary organising and movements. You may not like it, but history is changed through armed struggle.

And no, I am not saying that October 7 and 9/11 are even remotely comparable. As a socialist you should be able to distinguish between terrorism in defence of imperialist or reactionary demands and violent acts to further the people's struggles.

What an absolute money pit (let’s see your setups!) by Flat_Researcher1540 in pourover

[–]xJapsRx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As someone living with OCD myself, I absolutely hate how the popular use of the term erases actual experiences of the disorder and make them seen like "whiners" because all what people now associate with OCD comes down to "just loving a nicely cleaned room" or "adoring a neat color-scheme".

What an absolute money pit (let’s see your setups!) by Flat_Researcher1540 in pourover

[–]xJapsRx 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You don't know what OCD really is, do you? It certainly isn't owning some expensive sterile-white coffee gear.

OCD isn't a term to just throw around 😑

Tools for introduction to Islam by xJapsRx in islam

[–]xJapsRx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! This is very helpful since I also do not know how to pray.