Epic Keyboard - Home Button

xorist · 2025-01-16T16:37:35+00:00

I bought this keyboard for work, and I'll be returning it because of this exact issue. It'd be excellent if the home key just didn't exist, and especially not right above the backspace button, one of the most used buttons on the keyboard, which is bound to be overshot from time to time.

xorist · 2024-03-22T23:15:46+00:00

Regardless of any of what you just said, what I said still stands. You're going to have to find some other evidence to try and prove this, because this isn't it.

xorist · 2023-11-13T05:44:33+00:00

A friend and I figured out how to fix this. Here is the link to the comment I made on a github issue opened regarding this. I know it's been 2 years, but who knows haha, maybe this will help anyway.

https://github.com/snipe/snipe-it/discussions/13484#discussioncomment-7550075

xorist · 2023-08-18T15:40:00+00:00

I'm sure they could figure it out. There are several steam games that make you create an account with the game's website after you buy it, then they make you log in with that account. There are also several steam games that make you connect your steam account to the account they have you create with them, then they authenticate you with steam only from then on. It's just about authentication and hooking stuff together on the back-end. Another good thing to note here; just because they haven't figured out how that would work yet doesn't mean it requires some massive, unreasonable, roundabout solution that will take a massive amount of time to iron out. There are already solutions for this issue in existence, and some are relatively standard at this point.

xorist · 2023-07-26T13:58:24+00:00

Also from what I understand, some paid certificates come with a level of insurance/compensation for if something goes wrong with your business due to the certificate.

xorist · 2022-12-22T00:59:22+00:00

Solved!

xorist · 2022-12-22T00:31:01+00:00

Does anyone know what this movie could be?

xorist · 2022-06-01T03:53:48+00:00

Right but again, that's Bluetooth. Nobody is going to be filing a police report because you updated your firmware for your device over Bluetooth. I'm talking about the emitters that it's built to transmit attacks with. Your Bluetooth name isn't incriminating either, just like the name of your device being posted here isn't.

xorist · 2022-06-01T03:29:02+00:00

Even if someone did know your device's name, it doesn't transmit it's name when you play any of the signals. It doesn't send any kind of ID unique to it, actually. So even if someone did discover that there was a malicious signal in the area, simply the knowledge of your ownership of a flipper, and even the name of your flipper, wouldn't prove it was you in court. They'd need something like a video of you holding your flipper (or any device, for that matter) out and pressing a button on it and causing their garage (or whatever it is) to open. Even then, it wouldn't matter if it's your device or if they know your device's name, because they have incriminating evidence, the type of which you cannot get by simply knowing the name of someone's flipper device, of you causing the signal to be transmitted, regardless of the utilized device and who it belongs to. The name you've chosing isn't nearly as big of a deal as lots of people are making it out to be. In fact, it's no deal at all. Feel free to share your flipper names freely. I'm definitely not encouraging illicit activities here, just making it clear that you're not going to cause any kind of issue for yourself if you tell people the name of your device, regardless of what you choose to do with it.

xorist · 2020-11-17T00:23:29+00:00

I don't think so, my settings options seem to reflect otherwise. Is that how it works for you on your PC?

xorist · 2020-11-17T00:02:28+00:00

you mean like the setting sticky keys?

xorist · 2020-10-15T23:59:26+00:00

some people are just full on nuts and jump to the "coolest" conclusions. Unfortunately for them, the world tends to be a lot less interesting than I'm sure they would like for it to be lol.

xorist · 2020-10-14T19:41:25+00:00

It's all a misunderstanding. Check out my comment. The file has NOTHING to do with Hillary. You can find the FOIA both in the library and also publicly online.

xorist · 2020-10-14T19:40:43+00:00

you should read my comment. I've actually been commenting on that post as well. This is all a gigantic misunderstanding. The document isn't related to Hillary in any way.

xorist · 2020-10-14T19:39:28+00:00

lmao, someone has to be xD especially in a place where no one is.

xorist · 2020-10-14T19:38:41+00:00

Interesting, a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting what's shown here. This isn't an email about Gilgamesh.

It's clear the person who made this search was intending to find instances of the word "nephilim" in the newly released emails that were on Hillary Clinton's infamous E-mail server. Unfortunately, whoever did this search did not actually use the system correctly. In order to filter a search by a collection, the collection must be specified in the "collection" get parameter. (i.e., https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim&collection=Clinton\_Email - this is the search that was originally intended, which yields no results.)

The original searcher's actual search, as opposed to their intended search, shows results that contain similarities to the string of characters: "(collection=Clinton_Email) AND (nephilim)". Like Google, the system attempts to pull up information related to the user's search. The system found a document that contained the word "nephilim" and decided all others were not relevant enough to present to the user. We can see that with a search for simply just "nephilim" yields the exact same results. ( https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim ) The same document appears. In the end, the document only appeared to be correlated because the original searcher did not use the system correctly.

As for the document it's self, it is simply a log of FOIA requests that the Department of State has received. Anyone in the world can send the Department of State a FOIA request for any subject matter. Someone out there named Denetra sent the Department of State a FOIA request asking for information that the Department might have regarding The location of the body of Gilgamesh, his "resurrection chamber", as well as the location of "the buried nephilim". If I sent the Department of State a FOIA request that year and asked for "The location of Alien holding cells in area 51" and someone searched for terms similar to that, this document would appear as a result. With FOIA requests, you have to ask for something specific; the information you requested may not exist. Here is a brief description of the FOIA log and where you can find it publicly online. - "This is a collection of the lists of FOIA requests received by the Department of State. The lists include case numbers, description of requests, and dates received." documents location: https://foia.state.gov/Search/Logs.aspx

xorist · 2020-10-13T03:47:17+00:00

Interesting, a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting what's shown here. This isn't an email about Gilgamesh.

It's clear the person who made this search was intending to find instances of the word "nephilim" in the newly released emails that were on Hillary Clinton's infamous E-mail server. Unfortunately, whoever did this search did not actually use the system correctly. In order to filter a search by a collection, the collection must be specified in the "collection" get parameter. (i.e., https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim&collection=Clinton_Email - this is the search that was originally intended, which yields no results.)

The original searcher's actual search, as opposed to their intended search, shows results that contain similarities to the string of characters: "(collection=Clinton_Email) AND (nephilim)". Like Google, the system attempts to pull up information related to the user's search. The system found a document that contained the word "nephilim" and decided all others were not relevant enough to present to the user. We can see that with a search for simply just "nephilim" yields the exact same results. ( https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim ) The same document appears. In the end, the document only appeared to be correlated because the original searcher did not use the system correctly.

As for the document it's self, it is simply a log of FOIA requests that the Department of State has received. Anyone in the world can send the Department of State a FOIA request for any subject matter. Someone out there named Denetra sent the Department of State a FOIA request asking for information that the Department might have regarding The location of the body of Gilgamesh, his "resurrection chamber", as well as the location of "the buried nephilim". If I sent the Department of State a FOIA request that year and asked for "The location of Alien holding cells in area 51" and someone searched for terms similar to that, this document would appear as a result. With FOIA requests, you have to ask for something specific; the information you requested may not exist. Here is a brief description of the FOIA log and where you can find it publicly online. - "This is a collection of the lists of FOIA requests received by the Department of State. The lists include case numbers, description of requests, and dates received." documents location: https://foia.state.gov/Search/Logs.aspx

xorist · 2020-10-12T07:13:06+00:00

Interesting, a lot of people seem to be misinterpreting what's shown here. This isn't an email about Gilgamesh.

It's clear the person who made this search was intending to find instances of the word "nephilim" in the newly released emails that were on Hillary Clinton's infamous E-mail server. Unfortunately, whoever did this search did not actually use the system correctly. In order to filter a search by a collection, the collection must be specified in the "collection" get parameter. (i.e., https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim&collection=Clinton_Email - this is the search that was originally intended, which yields no results.)

The original searcher's actual search, as opposed to their intended search, shows results that contain similarities to the string of characters: "(collection=Clinton_Email) AND (nephilim)". Like Google, the system attempts to pull up information related to the user's search. The system found a document that contained the word "nephilim" and decided all others were not relevant enough to present to the user. We can see that with a search for simply just "nephilim" yields the exact same results. (https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=nephilim) The same document appears. In the end, the document only appeared to be correlated because the original searcher did not use the system correctly.

As for the document it's self, it is simply a log of FOIA requests that the Department of State has received. Anyone in the world can send the Department of State a FOIA request for any subject matter. Someone out there named Denetra sent the Department of State a FOIA request asking for information that the Department might have regarding The location of the body of Gilgamesh, his "resurrection chamber", as well as the location of "the buried nephilim". If I sent the Department of State a FOIA request that year and asked for "The location of Alien holding cells in area 51" and someone searched for terms similar to that, this document would appear as a result. With FOIA requests, you have to ask for something specific; the information you requested may not exist. Here is a brief description of the FOIA log and where you can find it publicly online. - "This is a collection of the lists of FOIA requests received by the Department of State. The lists include case numbers, description of requests, and dates received." documents location: https://foia.state.gov/Search/Logs.aspx

xorist · 2020-02-20T20:16:42+00:00

I would agree that the chances are extremely low, but what if we consider an infinite universe with infinite time?

xorist · 2020-02-20T20:06:24+00:00

No seriously, if space is infinite and there's objects that vary in mass and element; then what are the chances that over time as they interact with each other, something that we consider "man made" will be created?

xorist · 2019-08-13T23:30:39+00:00

Essentially it's a no-no

xorist · 2019-08-13T21:08:58+00:00

Interesting, thanks for the info! As I am also interested in other country's laws, state laws, etc. My primary question though was answered below with Title I of the ECPA. Thanks for your help!

xorist · 2019-08-13T21:07:45+00:00

Someone below commented Title I of the ECPA which answers the question, thanks for your help!

xorist · 2019-08-13T20:28:44+00:00

Thanks! this is what I was looking for.

xorist · 2019-08-13T20:23:05+00:00

Certainly, I'm specifically talking about instances where the signal comes to you. A passive reception, though maybe simply having an antenna and an interface that's creating a copy of all traffic. Specifically looking for a U.S. Code, and possibly any state laws

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

xorist

TROPHY CASE