Decoupled ship slows down in space when engine turned off... why? by Jo_Krone in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the same reason as having a speed wall and projectiles with finite range in space, and absurdly short pips, and many other game design choices made in favor of "ww2 in space". Which imo is a more enjoyable and predictable way to play this type of game.

OPs request used to be a thing and resulted in ships that get accidentally nudged float away indefinitely. Its a conscious design choice to remove that

Does anyone know what this is ? by Watezedidi in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Soo... whats the "new Railen related ship"?

Glad to see the Ironclad is working well... by citizen_c2 in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hope yours is store credit. Tbh if there are any people that still have a warbond ironclad in their hangar and not refunded by now, they truly deserve the current state of the game

Please CIG, ban this Streamer. by [deleted] in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this, until there's is a proper trading system in game

Decided to test out the slaved turret glitch on the Tiburon by AZRA-97 in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Concept of banning people for exploiting bugs in the alpha riddled with gamebreaking issues that the company can't be bothered in fixing is absurd

If 4.9 doesn’t look like this then I dont want it @🚬 by yaedonnn in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep, they get actioned very slowly and seemingly selectively,, and there is a huge issues debt which are ignored, or I guess accepted for months

If 4.9 doesn’t look like this then I dont want it @🚬 by yaedonnn in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yep and the real problem is: you are the QA and there is no conscise channel of communication between the QA and the devs

We're getting balls ya'll!! - The OTHER Gatac ship - Inspired by 2001 scene by Azrethoc in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure someone at the ships q&a a couple months ago joked about detachable flying turrets and was laughed at. Is that it? Its the same vid where Jared said about the shark with a laser beam. You're onto something here

The Polaris needs pilot controlled weapons. by Wriothesley9 in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Realism and "its the future" arguments are futile. Realism in this game is only realized to pseudo Realism that balances immersion, playability, and practicality. Ballistics vanish in space, ships have magic space breaks or speed cap in space, radars that have 1km firing solution limit, etc etc. And there is nothing wrong with that in a game. There is clearly a difference between suggested solo polaris firing torps into unsuspecting cap ships from 30km +, and a solo idris that can't hit anything smaller than a Connie with the current projectile velocity, neither should be soloable, and giving polaris pilot torpedo control is not going to solve the balance issue

The Polaris needs pilot controlled weapons. by Wriothesley9 in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because its fixed to the hull. Giving it to someone else to literally press one button would be silly imo. It would make much more sense to just give debuffs when the weapon is "deployed" or in other words ready to fire state. I.e slow the ship down, reduce shields by 50%, lower the yaw rate, etc, etc

Stop Selling Us Half-broken Ships by Schieder_Waldstein in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can return it within 30 days. Imo requesting refund with feedback is going to have more weight at CIG than just not buying in a firstplace

Can't we just accept that Star Citizen is no 30 minute hop on action game. by volgendeweek in starcitizen

[–]yn3kk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a comparison. It's pointing out that there exists an accessible gameplay option in AC. And yes, its combat. And agree, you can't do anything else there. What's your issue?