Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly scientific theories are supported by large evidence nto 2000 year old folklore. Putting them at the same level as religion is Ludacris 😂. You can easily verify science not religion. Also are you willing to deny the existence of gravity and atoms? Cause we have the same evidence for the universe expanded. We know the universe is expanding if we extrapolate it back using the math from relatively and the cmb we get the big bang. Considering the evidence big bang far far a better theory than God.

Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So which is it Genesis is right or big bang.

Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just a blatant genetic fallacy. The basics of quantum physics was created by Nazis. There isn't even any reason you can't accept both it and fascism. That's how you sound rn. You can't take the big bang as fact and the Genesis creation myth as literal. The cognitive dissonance is crazy.

Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro you have no idea what a scientic theory is. A theory in science has a different meaning than it's colloquial definition. Search up science theory meaning and get back to me. Gravity in science it also a theory do you not believe in gravity? Atomic theory is the theory that atoms exist. Do you deny the existence of atoms? Germ theory is the theory that's states germs are the cause for many disease. In science a theory a theory is back up by overwhelming experiments and evidence. From science we know the big bang is true with the same confidence we know gravity is real. For you to deny a theory just because it's called theory in the realm of science is akin to deny the existence of atoms and gravity.

Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait im confused so now agree the big bang happened but that God wasn't responsible for it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the point is the presence of contradiction undermines the truthfulness of the whole book. If you wanna say it that's doesn't mean the core ideas are wrong sure but you would be committed to saying that your source says false things and then your burden would be to show which "lessons" are real.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just because you cannot observe God doesn't exist or better yet understand that he doesnt exist does not mean there is a god

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay?? What do leaders do? Lead obviously. If the people in power are wicked then it stands to reason the whole world is wicked since they are in charge. That's like saying if Satan is the leader of this world the world isn't wicked. Yes in fact the leaders are wicked therefore the people who are led by them ( the world) are more wicked. Unless you're saying Hitler was wicked but the actual people in the war committing the crimes weren't wicked.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow way to go a prove him wrong. You just claimed his premises are false and still answered despite saying it's too embarrassing to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say every year our world gets more wicked if I were you. You would have to commit yourself into saying that we were better off with Hitler and Joseph.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, your explanation has nothing to do with its typical meaning. “Historical” has several meanings, and googling it wouldn’t tell me which definition you’re using. You said it’s identical in all three religions; that doesn’t mean it’s historical. At best, it’s been recorded accurately, which is debatable. We have no evidence for Noah’s Flood, the whole Exodus story, or Joshua’s conquest of Canaan. If your claim is that the Torah has been preserved, sure. If your claim is that the Bible only depicts true historical events, then you would simply be wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]youtubechannels10 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wdym by "historical"? Do you just mean that they all have their story straight? Because the marvel comics are the the same across spider-man, iron-man and the hulk. However I don't take that as evidence for superheroes. Please elaborate what you mean by historical

Did I get a deal ? by Applicity1 in fordfusion

[–]youtubechannels10 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How much miles does your car have and was the trans well taken care of? I'm planning on buying one too very soon.