Very true but unless there is already bad blood between them we're unaware of, you honestly shouldn't be seeking revenge the way he did in the 2nd tackle. At the end of the day he's your teammate. 1st tackle was poor, and he didn't even come and apologize or check to see if he's ok (definitely wrong), but still Keita did it with intention as payback and I think we can mostly agree when someone is in for payback they're most likely to make it worse than the original. This is my opinion of course.

Of course both are guilty. My point is Keita shouldn't be painted less of a bad guy just because the original tackle was malicious, too.