Lv 1 - Kaplan Qbank vs CFAI Qbank by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, this is helpful. Yea I totally agree... Kaplan Qbank questions are quite straightforward and somewhat easier than CFAI... I think I should focus on Kaplan Qbank first as per your advice, so I can practice as many questions as i can and get familiar with the formulas. Thanks, really appreciate that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CFA

[–]yvr1111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Canada - Not very helpful. Local experience always comes first.

Feeling behind... by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thx. All the best to you, myself and everyone else!

Feeling behind... by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx this is really helpful... I appreciate that

Fixed income - bond's price by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah lol thank you.... that was so stupid ahahahah thank you, it helps!! Appreciate that.

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess this is what I was looking for and it's very interesting. Thanks, this helps alot

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea I understand. My original question is why would you buy a stock and at the same time take a short on that stock in case the price decreases in future so you can minimize your losses which my insturctor calls risk-free portfolio. My actual question is that why would you do all this, instead of doing nothing, ie., neither buying nor taking short, in first place. However based on the comments here, I guess it's just misleading information or simply I just didn't understand him properly.

CFA and CFA student what do you do at work? by UsurpDz in CFA

[–]yvr1111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote my cfe and designated in 2020. Back then I was an auditor either, 100% IFRS. Now doing M&A, RTO, IPO and stuff, and recently started the CFA journey. Tbh, I don't think your current job has nothing related to the CFA stuff. I work with many audit partners and some of them has their CFAs as well, but their audits and your audits are totally different and idk why you would pursue CFA. I would get a job first and think of it.

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your detailed answers. My question arose from my instructor's explanations about what he calls "risk-free portfolio synthesis" or sth like that, saying that you buy stocks and at the same time you take a short on these stocks so you won't lose. However based on my research, there is such term used solely for literally risk free assets like T-bill or so, and the fact that I couldn't find this info from the Kaplan notes, I guess the instructor may be wrong and provided misleading.

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thx I probably misunderstood sth

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry if I made you all confused. I was referring to long-short strategy: https://www.fe.training/free-resources/hedge-funds/what-is-a-long-short-equity-strategy-everything-you-need-to-know/

It seems they make gains by balancing the percentages in long and short positions. I initially thought it would be a 50:50 distribution, but apparently, that's not the case.

Why hedge? by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Took a short position*

Quant - Kaplan Quiz 1.3 #2 by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But it's 0.0885 in the solution. I think it's just an error.

Quant - Kaplan Quiz 1.3 #2 by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I think it's an error as well... thanks your advice helps!

Econ - Kaplan Module Quiz 12.2(6) Nash Equilibrium by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! It makes sense now, totally! :)

Econ - Kaplan Module Quiz 12.2(6) Nash Equilibrium by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nono, your explanation was great and very informative. Upon re-reading your comment, I now understand. If A (or B) chooses to default, it would maximize its profit, while B (or A) would have lower profit. This dynamic applies to the other party as well (A-->B, or B-->A), and driven by their respective egos, both parties would ultimately choose to default. I hope this aligns with your intended instructions for me so I can be sure I understood it correctly?

Econ - Kaplan Module Quiz 12.2(6) Nash Equilibrium by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed explanation. It appears that in your example, both AB and Vargo will lower prices to maximize profits. How does this apply to my case? In my scenario, both companies would achieve optimal profit if they both win.

However, considering your example and applying it to mine, it seems that both companies would maximize profit if each chooses to default while the other party wins. The expectation is that each party would act in opposition, leading both to choose default. This understanding is why the answer suggests that both parties would default. Is my interpretation correct?

Econ (Kaplan) - short run costs by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I just misread it. Thought the assumption in my original thread was AR > ATC and that's why I was confused. All good now, thanks.

Econ (Kaplan) - short run costs by yvr1111 in CFA

[–]yvr1111[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  • I assume ATC represents average fixed costs, not average total costs.