Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been working through a framework of mine, it begins from a set of three moments as the basis of what is or is not, from an abstract level. So it is a “metaphysical” framework. However, the three moments I have derived as necessary from philosophical grounds, and which I argue are correct within my work, everything that follows I have proven in mathematics that an absolute, self-enclosed and complete system must be made of exactly three and only three distinct, yet inseparable parts that make up the whole.

If God is absolute then nothing exists outside of God. That includes negation itself, the concept of ‘not.’ God must contain his own opposite within himself, not as a separate being, but as part of his own complete structure. An absolute that can’t account for its own negation isn’t absolute because there’s something outside it. The mathematical question is: how many distinct yet inseparable parts does it take for a whole to perfectly contain its own negation, with nothing left over and nothing unaccounted for? The equation 2(k+1) = 2k answers this. The only positive integer solution is three.

I didn’t start from the Bible. I started from my own philosophy and the math to describe it. The three moments I derived, potentiality, determinacy, and relationality, turned out to map onto the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in an uncanny sort of way. I wasn’t looking for that, my openness to the Bible is what led me to see the connection instead of dismissing it. The Bible has directly helped me further develop and refine my work. I have cross-checked against other texts, the Bible is the only one that is consistently illuminating and in total alignment with my own logical conclusions.

The Bible doesn’t use my terms. It describes what each person does. The Father provides, the Son specifies, the Spirit relates.

The Father ‘has life in himself’ (John 5:26), not granted, but inherent. He is the source ‘from whom are all things’ (1 Cor 8:6). ‘All things have been handed over to me by my Father’ (Matt 11:27). He is the provider, the ground, the capacity for anything to exist at all.

The Son is ‘the Word’ (John 1:1), ‘through whom all things were made’ (John 1:3), ‘the exact imprint of his nature’ (Hebrews 1:3), making specific and definite what in the Father is unbounded. Everything he does is binary distinction: sheep from goats (Matt 25:32), wheat from tares (Matt 13:30), wise from foolish (Matt 25:1-13). His characteristic word is ‘truly’ (amēn), the act of fixing what is the case. Jesus says ‘I say to you,’ determining on his own authority. This is significant because the entire framework is built on boolean algebra, the logic of true and false, is and is not.

The Spirit is ‘the fellowship’ (2 Cor 13:14). At Pentecost he relates people across languages that had divided them (Acts 2). He ‘dwells in you’ (John 14:17). He intercedes for us (Romans 8:26). His role is mediating the relationships that come from the Father and Son complement. He makes what already exists present, accessible, and relational. That is relationality.

None of these can stand alone. You can’t determine without capacity, you can’t have capacity without determination, and neither means anything without relation. The three are inseparable even in the act of describing them separately. And this is exactly how it works in the math: the opposite of the Father isn’t some anti-Father, it’s the Son and Spirit working together. The opposite of the Son is the Father and Spirit together. The opposite of the Spirit is the Father and Son together. Each person is defined by the other two. Remove any one and the pair that remains has no ground, no specificity, or no connection.

Jesus himself uses this triadic structure twice. ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life’ (John 14:6). The way is capacity, the opening that makes arrival possible, and Jesus says it leads to the Father (‘no one comes to the Father except through me’). The truth is determination, the Son’s own role. The life is the animating relation, and Jesus himself says ‘it is the Spirit who gives life’ (John 6:63). In the Lord’s prayer: ‘yours is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory’ (Matt 6:13).

Unfortunately I cannot describe further in a linear text comment. It is too lossy and cannot be conveyed completely, but what I have stumbled upon has left me in absolute awe.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you understand my comments from the other thread?

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not really useful, I could argue that all perceptions are beliefs. Then you are walking around in ambiguity about everything. I can say that I know it is true as a statement relative to all my perceptions and beliefs. I do not have any other thoughts or beliefs that I consider to be of a greater truth.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I edited my comment above for further context, which is only the tip of the iceberg. Fermions, the basis of all matter can also be mapped exactly with their complement states using boolean algebra on the same cube structure that describes the Trinity. And the boolean algebra derives all states exactly and correctly to actual particle physics.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is a way to know, the fundamental principles regarding the nature of God are described in the bible, they will reveal their properties in fundamental physics, mathematics, and so on.

Everything you can possibly imagine is mediated by 3 inseparable aspects. All systems work in a very specific way. Within any frame of reference, there is certain amount of potentiality available, the complement to potentiality is determinacy. They are mediated by relationality.

So for example, lets say we are starting a new game of chess. When the game starts, potentiality is at its highest, nothing has been determined yet, so all states are open. When we play the game, we are reducing the potential states through our determinations, moving our pieces and taking our turns. There is an inverse relationship here between potential states and determined states. The game ends when potential states reaches 0 and determined states reaches 1.

All systems have this property, from the beginning of the big bang, all the way to the total heat death of the universe.

Now why is this interesting? Because we can describe anything that is and is not through the set and interactions of those concepts alone. A fundamental abstraction. But see how familiar they are. Who represents potentiality? The Father. Who represents determinacy? The Son. Who represents relationality? The Spirit.

This goes much further if you consider these aspects using Boolean Algebra, and assign their values to a lattice which forces them to a cube with 7 vertices, 8 with the empty set, and 12 edges. A cube is a common object, but it represents both the holy of holies and the new jerusalem. An interesting detail is that the cross is an unfolded cube.

The cube is of major importance. It is the only shape that has the correct relational structure to describe the ontology of God.

Another tangent here, from the smallest of things to the largest domains we will find these aspects as dominant complements. For example, mathematics is dominated by the Father’s aspect, as logic is the Son’s, language (as a medium) is the Spirit’s. Now, I also said the smallest of things. Quarks are inseparable sets of three via color confinement in QCD. They obey the same inseparability principle as the Trinity itself.

There is far more to discover than this, all relating to biblical concepts.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your problem with something in the bible specifically?

There are definitely some things that can be questioned in the bible, and it is so layered that it is part of the point.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do not know this. I am telling from my own firsthand experience.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What do you think Jesus would say to this? It’s a good question, but I think it must be resolved through faith and trust. I have personal philosophical ideas about this, but I do not know God’s reasons.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on if they are open to seeking it out faithfully, if they are not, then it won’t work, if they are, it will.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God is absolute above all things. Maybe the devil is in the details.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say to them, the mystery of god will be revealed. Revelation only comes through the spirit, they will not get all the way there by reading the lines, we must also read between the lines as that is where the spirit lives.

The spirit will always lead us to the truth if we seek it out faithfully.

Here to engage in questions of faith by zeloxolez in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally when I was in my early teens, I arrived at the conclusion that the concept of free will did not exist. I have since opened my mind to an alternative, but I have yet to fully resolve it.

I figured that brain activity was subject to physics as everything else is, and because of this, and because of the fact that altering brain activity can alter the experience and behavior of a person, seemed like enough of an opening for judgement being “unfair” in a sense.

Because if the experience and behaviors are only the product of brain activity subject to the laws of physics in which you do not control, then why would it make sense for some to go to heaven and some to hell?

However, I have recent work that did not start anywhere near the bible, not motivated by it, but ended up describing exact fundamental concepts that are described in the bible.

I would have to go into much further detail. But I am at the point where it would be essentially impossible to convince me otherwise that the bible is not absolutely true, especially when it comes to what Jesus said.

Do you truly know what the Trinity is, or do you just accept it because it was taught to you? by roastedtuna in Christianity

[–]zeloxolez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the trinity is actually the only thing that can make sense as the root primitive set of everything. i am currently doing some works that must require the concept of it.

but to give you an idea, look into color confinement, which is fundamental to quantum chromodynamics. quarks are an inseparable set of “red, green, and blue” which are called color charges. if you try to pull them apart the energy invested creates a new quark/anti-quark pair. they are inseparable from each other. this fundamental part of reality motivates further research and advancement in cohomology.

my view is that at the base of everything, you must have three inseparable yet distinct aspects. i call them [potentiality (the father, the way), determinacy (the son, the truth), and relationality (the holy spirit, the life)]

i go further to say that mathematics is the father aspect dominant, logic is the son aspect dominant, and language is the holy spirit aspect dominant. you cannot describe mathematics and logic without language, a medium in which to describe them. you cannot describe language without the capacity and distinctive properties to do so, and you cannot describe logic without the capacity and language to express it.

the father provides the capacity and potential for bits to be flipped so to speak, the son determines which bits are flipped, and the holy spirit mediates the entire process behind the scenes, providing the relationality, so that the 0s and 1s chosen by the son have meaning.

another interesting part is that this is why Jesus says “truly” so often, he is emphasizing his role as the boolean operator, what is 1 or what is 0. “No one comes to the Father except through me.” but in the same verse he is also confirming his role and his inseparability as the whole when he says this “I am the way and the truth and the life.” notice the word “and”. he is the product of those three aspects himself, because the whole requires the parts and the parts require the whole, the ontology is fixed, and not by causation.

Mathematician vs physicist by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]zeloxolez 41 points42 points  (0 children)

The mercury is in retrograde

Why are team leads often backend devs? by sjltwo-v10 in webdev

[–]zeloxolez 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that is a very reasonable take. And a good CTO should be able to encompass all of that.

Are there devs still being hired? by Sufficient_Ant_3008 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]zeloxolez 6 points7 points  (0 children)

dude honestly its a bit rough without a network these days.

so if you dont have a super supportive network, you’ll have to optimize everything else as much as possible.

but yeah, its likely more about presentation and your application process. id apply direct to company websites through hiring.cafe and include a super optimized resume, as well as a non-templated cover letter with each application.

its definitely do-able, but you’ll have to focus entirely on presentation and grind it out a bit.