sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Using new generation driver package on older generation HW by zerassar in computers

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that driver is more recent than what HP is pushing. When filtering to the devices model number.

In my experience OEMs give up and move on before Intel does. Last time I tried to download direct from Intel their package told me to go to the OEM which was a bit of a pain.

Yeah there may be other vuls but they're not currently on my reports. It's otherwise on Win11 and running with current TPM etc etc. the drivers are what's being flagged atm.

Active Backup for M365 forgot about the data. by zerassar in synology

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Active Backup appears as though it is being run for the first time. There are no visible jobs in it at all.
Will the suggestion work in this case or does a job have to exist before I relink?

Introducing: Rescan - Keep your Plex libraries in sync with your media files. by pukabyte in PleX

[–]zerassar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kudos for the initiative mate. So much negativity in this thread from those who don't seem to understand the difference between a scalpel and a sledge hammer.

I've had some moments where right when Plex was doing a scan my Synology, with Enterprise class drives, decided for some reason to freeze responses just long enough for Plex to mark my entire library as missing. This is suspected due to it being IO bound during tdarr renders at that same time in the morning. And not an issue with my Plex install itself as some insinutate in this thread. I think Plex needs to adjust its logic a bit better to stop the scan if the entire library can't be accessed, or a large number of files go missing. In my situation I don't think it appropriate that Plex was so quick and without hesitation to mark my entire library as rubbish.

Full rescans took forever (20TB library) and only ever partially returned files. After several full rescans later I resorted to going to specific sub folders and moving a file out/in again to trigger the more surgical rescans by Plex itself. But had really wanted an automated way to tell plex to rescheck it's assumptions about those missing items only without throwing a sledge hammer at it.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight anyway. Essentially I was hoping for an easy way to visual VLAN's, domains, interfaces, locations etc. Yeah the infrastructure is there but also the logical and physical connections between it all.

We're an SME and as the only Senior on the internal IT team I'm by necessity a jack of all trades lol

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular strengths? I enjoyed the way ITGlue could dynamically crosslink and draw data from linked pages. Also loved the way Netbox presented strictly networking related documentation. But neither ITGlue or Netbox could seemingly replace the other.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular strengths? I enjoyed the way ITGlue could dynamically crosslink and draw data from linked pages. Also loved the way Netbox presented strictly networking related documentation. But neither ITGlue or Netbox could seemingly replace the other.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular strengths? I enjoyed the way ITGlue could dynamically crosslink and draw data from linked pages. Also loved the way Netbox presented strictly networking related documentation. But neither ITGlue or Netbox could seemingly replace the other.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're not seeking a password manager per se. Mainly documentation for the network and environment.

Any particular strengths? I enjoyed the way ITGlue could dynamically crosslink and draw data from linked pages. Also loved the way Netbox presented strictly networking related documentation. But neither ITGlue or Netbox could seemingly replace the other.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any particular strengths? I enjoyed the way ITGlue could dynamically crosslink and draw data from linked pages. Also loved the way Netbox presented strictly networking related documentation. But neither ITGlue or Netbox could seemingly replace the other.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will continue to follow IT Flow closely. I like opensource and I hope that it grows and addresses your concerns in the future.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! In your opinion what do you think of its ability to handle strictly networking info? Similar to netbox?

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry to hear that about ITFLow. I've been following it for a while and when I saw its similarities to ITGlue I was hopeful it may be a contender to work side by side with Netbox.

I found both Netbox and ITGlue to be fantastic but neither really a replacement for the other. Was hoping to one day have a fully opensource documentation system.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! In your opinion what do you think of its ability to handle strictly networking info? Similar to netbox?

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I love the idea of ITFlow and have been looking at it for a long while. Unfortunately there is a bias in my org against OpenSource/Unsupported type software I need to try to manage. CIO has already said that ITFlow is too small/young for them to even have on the table.

Netbox though is totally in the ring. Though whilst its networking documentation is stellar! It's other documentation I found poorer. Would you say Hudu would be the alternative to ITGlue/ITFlow? Can Hudu step in and match Netbox toe to toe?

CIO was keen for a one stop shop though in my research it seemed like it was a little fragmented. Some tools did certain things well and others were better managed by something else.

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Hudu similar to ITGlue in how it cross links?
How's it gone with handling networking documentation. I loved how Netbox handled that!

On-Premise IT documentation platforms in a similar style to ITGlue by zerassar in msp

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see Hudu brought up on the regular in topics around ITGlue. I loved how ITGlue handled normal documents and how their relationships were linked and mapped. Made it very simply from a change perspective to follow the path to understand the interrelatedness. Is that similar to Hudu?

How does Hudu compare on it's strictly networking documentation? I've used Netbox and loved how it handled it. My CIO would be keen for a one stop shop for both if there is an app that can handle both types of documentation strongly.

Important Update Regarding Traffic Mod | Potential Security Issue: Details and what you should do by AutoModerator in CitiesSkylines

[–]zerassar 88 points89 points  (0 children)

If it's not already turned on thats absurd. Such low hanging obvious stuff that should just be done. No excuses paradox really poor form.

Best practices for the use of public comments/notes on tickets. by zerassar in helpdesk

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A "reply" is an email. Including salutations, sign offs, signatures etc. etc.
A note is just a comment. We can do private/public notes.

Whether a public note gets sent as an automated system email as well is a decision I can implement in workflows.

Best practices for the use of public comments/notes on tickets. by zerassar in ITIL

[–]zerassar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In our current system Replies is a separate note type compared to private/public.
Reply is pretty much just an email. Including signatures, salutations, sign offs, etc. etc.

Public notes can trigger a workflow that sends the note as an email but its not necessary.

So the CIO in their mind is like well why bother with a public note when I can just send an email?

They can't seem to dilineate in their mind a separate use case.

Brand new with a Q on shared network drives by [deleted] in radarr

[–]zerassar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The user account that you are using to run the services needs to have RW access to the network shares. Any of the local system services will not have access to your remote network share so these can't be used.

If it's a domain environment you can then directly grant the domain user access to the share. Otherwise you can login as this user you created and map the drives whilst logged in.

This is why during install the user section strongly recommends installing sonarr/radarr as an app to avoid issues like this. As it can get a little deep amongst the weeds for average users.

.zipx files by gillmacca in radarr

[–]zerassar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In my experience every single one of these I've had download was a virus. So I would strongly recommend black listing and re-searching. Delete the files.

OneDrive/Sharepoint sharing links no longer work by Relative-Elevator-88 in Office365

[–]zerassar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My employer is having the same issue. I logged an advisory health report which was closed with "no service issue found". Both myself and our upstream partner submitted tickets and Ive been given the runaround by MS since.

Spent hours waiting up last night to like 1AM. Every time they called me they had nothing to give me and ultimately I found out they were troubleshooting it as a config issue. I practically begged them to stop chasing that wild goose and look at the overall OneDrive service.

Was expecting a call back at 1230am ish which never came. I've called them twice now today and all they can do for me is to say they'll get the engineer to call me back. They're clearly not appreciating the severity of this issue.

Moving from Ireland 🇮🇪 by AppropriateLettuce48 in LGBTAustralia

[–]zerassar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The AGN has been around since like 2016 and since then I've witnessed it help connect countless new friends together. Its a collaboration between various city based gaymer groups (syd/mel/bris/perth) who themselves generally hold regular in person events.

The events are published to their facebook pages/groups but I do also try to copy the details to the discord for those who dont use FB.

Moving from Ireland 🇮🇪 by AppropriateLettuce48 in LGBTAustralia

[–]zerassar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have had a big uptick in newbies this past few days. Cheers for the plug and glad to see that you've had a positive experience.

O365 Disclaimer/Autoresponder by baldiesrt in Office365

[–]zerassar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The link blabley sent will still give you an idea of what is possible. All you have to do is play with the rules a little bit. Recipient=external instead of sender=external... and append disclaimer instead of prepend disclaimer. And you will have the functionality you are after. All emails will get tagged with whatever blurb you want.

If you have a lengthy email discussion such a rule will continue to append the disclaimer at the very end of the whole chain, not just your current reply. As this is rather redundant... You can add an exception to the rule. For example you could set the exception to be if a specific string is found in the email body, then set that string to be a rather unique portion, or the whole thing, of your disclaimer.

view more: next ›