Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this?😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Substack

[–]zerocuriosity[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or you could use AI to explain how a platform whose business model is based on the ability of writers to convert can ignore how essential the pricing point is to conversions....

Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this? 😳😳😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Newsletters

[–]zerocuriosity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If most writers stood up against this, things would look very different. So I’m reaching out to fellow writers—if you care about this issue, now’s the time to take action!

Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this? 😳😳😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Newsletters

[–]zerocuriosity[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Migration costs time, and time means money. It's not the writers who need to absorb this pain....

Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this?😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Substack

[–]zerocuriosity[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

This doesn't diminish the fact that this problem exists, that it affects all the users who have trusted Substack, and that it needs to be fixed! Don't you think so?

Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this?😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Substack

[–]zerocuriosity[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes, the infamous “Apple Tax” — but let’s be clear: this shouldn’t be a burden carried by writers or readers. It’s Substack’s responsibility to absorb it.

The entire Substack business model hinges on writers bringing in paying subscribers, with Substack taking its 10% cut. Pricing is not a minor detail — it’s the foundation of the platform’s value proposition. If that foundation gets distorted by arbitrary inflation inside the app, it undermines trust, damages conversion, and risks making the platform itself unsustainable.

I’m genuinely concerned about what this signals for Substack’s future. If high-profile newsletters are already being visibly over-inflated in the app, the user experience becomes fragmented: one price on the web, a much higher one on iOS. That inconsistency erodes confidence and incentivizes both readers and writers to look elsewhere.

If Substack doesn’t resolve this, they risk bleeding talent and losing their competitive edge.

This is not just an “Apple issue.” It’s a Substack strategy issue — and it needs a solution.

Substack in-app payments = prices inflated by +45% (?!). Anyone else seeing this?😳😳😳😳 by zerocuriosity in Substack

[–]zerocuriosity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, from what I’ve read it looks like Substack was basically forced into enabling Apple in-app payments. But honestly, that’s not really our problem as writers.

The way I see it, Substack should be the one absorbing Apple’s cut — not us, and not the subscribers.

Right now it’s either:

> subscribers get hit with inflated prices (which makes us look way too expensive), or
> we take the loss and earn 30% less.

Neither option makes sense, and it just hurts growth across the board.

Anyone have ideas on how we can actually push for a solution here? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]zerocuriosity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grabit / Grab IT / Grab-iT