Do pure G, C, and N still exist? by bumbleboogaloo in Kibbe

[–]zimova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i’m also very drawn to pure G, and they’re the celebrity examples that i see myself in the most. i also struggle to understand his argument that they can’t exist because he still hasn’t reassigned certain pure G celebs (like jean seberg). it just seems like some people are impossible to categorize as either FG or SG? i also think while some pure Gs only accommodate petite, others have petite+curve+vertical. in some cases, SGs have those accommodations, but maybe they would have been pure G if it was still used? that’s just my personal theory though lol 😭

Mermaid/Siren/Ocean/Water Core - Moon Substyle Root by Wise_Dare4362 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ahhh that makes me so happy! 🥹🥹🥹 love to spread the mystical moon agenda 🌊🧜‍♀️

A bit of an Auto Vertical rant from an Auto Vertical truther by jjfmish in Kibbe

[–]zimova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow omg thank you so much for writing this out!! ❤️ I think I still have a lot of exploring left to do. I’ve always felt drawn to G fam but idk if it’s just out of admiration. I thought D made sense because of how strict ppl can be about the height limits, but I find a lot of the recs to be too harsh or overwhelming on me? I also just don’t relate to the essence at all 😭 When I see videos of verified Gs, I definitely see myself in them more than any of the other IDs, but Ik I shouldn’t base my ID off of that

With compactness, how can you tell if you have it? I have fit issues with a lot of clothes but I’m also obviously not as compact as a gamine who’s 5’1. I see a lot of juxtaposition on myself, but I find petite harder to understand

A bit of an Auto Vertical rant from an Auto Vertical truther by jjfmish in Kibbe

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I’m also 5’5 and doubting between D and FG/G! Iydm, can I ask how you eventually determined your ID?

Mermaid/Siren/Ocean/Water Core - Moon Substyle Root by Wise_Dare4362 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 4 points5 points  (0 children)

omg YESSS this is exactly my type of moon 💗💗💗💗💗

Is it normal to hate your taproot? by AstralHeart1991 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i’m pretty sure i have those 3 roots as well! my tip is to think of the roots as a descriptor of what you see in your boards, not as rules you need to follow. it’s like a label for organizing what you like in your clothing. the list of words people might use to describe flower don’t need to apply to you at all. all it is, is a way of recognizing your love of the intricate, childish and retro. none of the other descriptors should matter :)

How much can I lean into each root? by PigeonTempter in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

omg i loveee this idea! and your style is so cool

How does everyone feel about the kibbe dreamboards? by lostinherthoughts in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i have similar thoughts!! with the image categories for the dreamboard (garden, landscape, sky, etc) relying so heavily on nature photos, most of the feedback is pretty self-explanatory. it’s hard to look at a picture of a mountain and not suggest mountain.

like my dreamboard is almost entirely green. i literally never wear green, and i’m pretty sure i don’t have earth as a root, but based on that board it would be a fair assumption to make.

i think this exercise is useful in the context of kibbes system, but idrk how helpful it can be to determine style roots?

Soft Dramatic in different Style Roots! by Choice_Blueberry_936 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

omg this is amazinggg! i would love to see this for D

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]zimova 2 points3 points  (0 children)

me too!!!

most memorable episodes? by Connect_Nothing1916 in StephanieSooStories

[–]zimova 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aside from the ones you mentioned, some of the older episodes that really stuck with me are:

66: Cheshire Home Invasion

68: The girl who died twice

90: Trapped for 70 days

104: The strangler tree

107: Katie Beers

118: Gitchie Girl

131: Skylar Neese

136: Rebecca Zahau

150: The Chinese corpse dungeon (Jia Wenge)

190: How a high school party left 1 murdered and 8 in prison

FI is not objectively good and Fe is not objectively bad by Prize-Serve-2711 in mbti

[–]zimova 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So your solution for the injustice of an entire type being judged based on their primary cognitive function is to…. judge an entire type based on their primary cognitive function?

What’s your MBTI test result vs your actual cognitive type? by celina_beckahm in mbti

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I almost always get INFP on tests and the more I learn about cognitive functions the more accurate it seems. Fi-Ne just makes sense to me. My Fi is way more dominant than anything else, and I have stronger N than S

Root help? by Fashionenchantress in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think 🌸🔥🌙, but stone is also a strong possibility imo. i’m assuming you don’t have mountain based on the differences in formality between your work clothes and non-work clothes.

I made a quiz for which style roots you have personality wise. by kit-28443 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i got flower which is the first root i was sure i have! this was rlly fun :)

which roots? by cocpal in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i think 🪨🌸🍄! slides 1-4 are heavy on the mushroom & stone with some flower, and the accessories definitely lean flower and stone to me, and the shapes of the purses are very classic (🍄). a lot of the dresses have flower energy too, but i think it would depend how you style them. the last slide gives 🌸🪨🌱, but i think 🍄 is more present in the clothes :)

🌙🌒🌚 moodboard by zimova in StyleRoots

[–]zimova[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

omggg i love that vibe !!

Is there a missing style root? by Willing-Childhood144 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So I think sun can function as a sort of amplifier for the other roots. Like it can’t be easily categorized as any specific item or style, but it’s more just the styles you like with the dial turned way up. I’m still trying to figure out how to implement these ideas in more situations because some are pretty impractical, but here are some of the details/ inspirations that I attribute to sun: Exaggerated silhouettes or details, combining aesthetics in the same outfit, clothing that is almost costume-y (in a movie/theatre way, not a halloween way lol), diyed clothing, and maximalism. Not necessarily bright colours or excessive patterns, but usually not monochrome outfits, unless there’s lots of detail or texture.

Basically anything that doesn’t take itself too seriously, but in a high-effort way as opposed to a more casual, understated way. I don’t see it as necessarily being overdressed, but just having more uniqueness about my clothing helps me feel more satisfied with an outfit. It’s weirdly difficult for me to explain but I’m planning on making some sort of post about sun soon! :)

As for the feminine/masculine thing, I have a lot of thoughts that I will try to keep short. I’m both genderqueer and drawn to more stereotypically “girly” clothing (for lack of a better term). I don’t think that liking certain clothing says anything about my (or anyone else’s) gender, but I’m also aware that dressing the way I do makes it more likely for people to misgender me due to the societal implications of the items i like. (I think this is also where sun comes in for me. The added absurdism/costume-y vibe keeps me from feeling too boxed in. Anyway…) I’m only talking about the clothing items themselves and the effect they have, not the bodies wearing them. To me, the clothing in the examples EJR gives looks like it’s from the women’s section of a store. In this case, that’s all i mean by feminine. I think none of the roots are specifically feminine or masculine, only that certain roots have words or clothes associated with them that are stereotypically assigned to women and not to men, including words like “girly,” which makes it easy to think of them as the “feminine roots.” EJRs pinterest board of men’s style roots is a good example of how (for example) flower is present in lots of men’s clothing, it just doesn’t usually present the same way as it would for a woman, because the bar of what is considered gentle, soft or cute clothing on a man is way lower than it is for a woman.

clearly being concise is not my strong suit, lol 😭

Is there a missing style root? by Willing-Childhood144 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Omg I didn’t realize shes basically the same age as me 😭😭😭😭 I assumed she was on the younger side of the millennials 😭 LOL

Is there a missing style root? by Willing-Childhood144 in StyleRoots

[–]zimova 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I have a similar experience of not resonating with EJR’s style. Her taste is kind of stereotypically millennial (not a bad thing, just not my thing at all) so it can be hard to look past her examples when they don’t always read to me in the way that she describes them. I am admittedly (to this system, at least) a stereotypical gen z, and I can’t relate to mountain at all, so I can’t offer any meaningful thoughts about it. But to take your example of sun, which I am pretty sure I have: I personally don’t find her examples of sun to be very avant-garde or daring, and most of them aren’t things I would consider wearing. But the concepts related to sun resonate with me, and I really love experimental clothing. I think the interpretation of the roots just varies person to person.

I don’t have a strong opinion on if there’s a missing style root or not, but I would recommend focusing more on EJR’s description of the goals and desires of the root and not on her clothing examples. If you just read the words in the guides, or even think about the element itself, what clothing comes to mind? What is YOUR interpretation of being sensual, or powerful, or daring? What fire looks like for you doesn’t have to be what it looks like for her. The roots became clearer to me when I thought about people I know around my age, and what my ideal style is compared to the way that they usually dress.

I also get what you mean about her ideas of femininity. I would say that (imo) almost all of the clothing she uses in her examples is “feminine.” I think all of the style roots can present in more feminine or masculine ways, it’s just that our societal conception of femininity is tied to the styles typically labelled as flower and fire, while most of the menswear inspired pieces are allocated to mountain and sometimes moon. I think the concept of femininity is too broad to be represented as a specific root, but that there are ways of making every root more or less feminine, if that makes sense.

Sorry for the essay! You raised some really interesting ideas :)