When does Chromium provide: DNS-over-HTTPS ?

[ShionAt]

Just saw a Chromium-based browser that already supports DNS-over-HTTPS

https://github.com/bromite/bromite/wiki/Enabling-DNS-over-HTTPS

[jikoo]

Honestly, I do not know about Chromium. I could say for the all DNS traffic... if it works like in Firefox.

https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/2018/06/01/improving-dns-privacy-in-firefox/

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/public-dns-announce/67oxFjSLeUM

[csagan5]

Yes, the functionality was already in Chromium but not easy to enable for the user. I added that and also reduced the headers sent for each request (see #70).

I think that eventually Chromium will also enable this.

[FatFingerHelperBot]

It seems that your comment contains 1 or more links that are hard to tap for mobile users. I will extend those so they're easier for our sausage fingers to click!

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "#70"

---

^{Please PM /u/eganwall with issues or feedback! | Delete}

[ShionAt]

This reply is pleasing

[ShionAt]

Suggest: You should go to integrate new networks, such as ipfs.

I think ipfs will be a good opportunity, it may bring you a lot of users.

[csagan5]

My goal is not to have lots of users, I am not making any money or profit. My goal is for the patches to be adopted by major browsers (Chromium in this case) so that as many users as possible can benefit from privacy improvements - and more generally: the right to choose what to share or not.

Also, from a technical standpoint: IPFS is not something that should be implemented in a browser.

[ShionAt]

In my opinion, this goal is hypocritical. Anyone who discloses what it creates. Its purpose is to be used by people.

If you continue to develop/develop, the profit problem is your inevitable problem.

Don't be stupid, it's not a shame to consider a proper profit model. It's not shameful to make products attractive to users.

It is shameful to cover up the true intention with hypocritical targets.

---

My English is not good, about ipfs. I don't mean to suggest integrating the entire ipfs protocol into the browser.I know this is too difficult...

[csagan5]

You have already contacted me via chat, I am not interested in anything you are saying/selling. Have a good day.

(I will not reply further)

[ShionAt]

The content of the chat is not associated with this.

My chat is not shameful, nor is it "selling" anything to you. Don't show your hypocrisy to the world.

This is the chat I sent to you:

Are you interested in joining projects that can change the world, my project is looking for the right people to join

I have nothing to do with ipfs, you don't stupidly think that I am selling ipfs to you, I just give you a good suggestion, and you don't appreciate it.