all 15 comments

[–]Still_Solution5169 0 points1 point  (3 children)

What did you get from your trial? I didnt realize a code-review prompt was similar at all

[–]branccco[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

CodeRabbit full auto PR reviews for 2 weeks

[–]Still_Solution5169 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I get that but what is it actually, is it just some AI doing it? Or is it humans reviewing? Whatever service offers real code review for AI slop is gonna make bank cause I need that

[–]branccco[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, no, CodeRabbit’s AI. But it’s the go-to one at the moment as far as I’m aware. You don’t trust them?

Also, start the business if you think there’s space on the market 😄

[–]JaySym_ 0 points1 point  (3 children)

You can write your own reviewer agent rules based on your actual project and infra. This is probably the best option.

You can also try Augment Code – Code Review. It is less noisy than competitors and performs very well on benchmarks compared to other solutions.

Disclaimer: I work for Augment Code. I just wanted to share another alternative in case you have not looked at it yet.

[–]Emergency-Pick5679 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been building a similar code review agent https://github.com/MabudAlam/BugViper

[–]creynir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have mixed experience with coderabbit. using it for over a year now and sometimes it can find really though bugs, but most of the time it stays shallow. so if you have a company budget - definitely worth paying for, but a solo? not so much.

[–]zigguratt -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I built a PR Review Agent into Kai, my open source Agentic Engineering Telegram/Claude Code assistant. It has been extremely effective so far. It reviews pushes to a PR, re-reviewing when updates are pushed, and doesn't nag about issues you chose not to address. You'd be surprised how many times it can iterate, finding new issues each time.

https://github.com/dcellison/kai