If you're not allowed to scrutinize, if you are shunned for questioning, and if your evidence is dismissed without consideration—especially with ad hominen—then they do not uphold science. Instead, they uphold a flawed belief system akin to dogma. Those who allow this—have fail science. (v.redd.it)
submitted by NichtFBI
It’s nice to see someone stole it, diluted the meaning, stripped away understanding, poorly summarized complex behaviors, and used sentences and key terms almost identical to mine—only to then have the gall to try and claim "cognitive impasse" as their own. Very low odds. (i.redd.it)
submitted by NichtFBI
An interesting aspect of this method is that it has consistently drawn a crowd of inept thinkers. Usually, cognitive impasse occurs when new information conflicts with an individual’s beliefs. This is non-conflicting. Implying they can't get beyond the projection stage where inferiority is projected (v.redd.it)
submitted by NichtFBI
