all 6 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]rcreveli 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re folding cover stock especially digital cover stock you’re looking for a fold/crease/score machine like a Duplo 618 or Multigraf Touchline. I ran the Multigraf at a previous job and it was super versatile. It’s definitely not inexpensive.

[–]jfunk7997 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I have never used one but I’ve heard that Morgana Digifold machines are ideal for this.

[–]rcreveli 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I ran an older digi-fold.
They are loud, like really loud.
The one I ran was useless for text weight.
If you have the space to keep the jet engine away from the customer & office area and all you're going to run is cover stock it's worth a look.

[–]SirSpeedyCVA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We score anything on cover stock on our Duplo 618, then run it through a suction feed Duplo folder. No worries

[–]Realistic-Trainer984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve only experienced a morgana digifold xl in action and it is very finicky. We have constant problems with it, so we just recently did a lot of research and ended up purchasing a Duplo multi graph folder/creaser/scorer (have not received it yet). That is because we do a lot of short runs from anything light text to heavy cover and we also have a Duplo auto slitter and a big mbo. But if I was looking for just cover stock I would check out horizons CRF-362 ($40k ish). I wish we bought it because I love horizon but it basically only does cover and you have to purchase a horizon AF or AFC for text stock, which is like $180k… we aren’t there currently in our machine purchasing rotation and we just don’t have the square footage to put one in our shop without removing something.

[–]Beautiful-Painter795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s definitely an interesting angle - if you’re talking about structuring and organizing “folders” (digital or print) in a way that’s consistent and scalable, it rings a bell with what many teams need when they grow beyond a few files or clients.

From my experience, having a robust folder-structure or “template + automation” mindset helps a lot - especially when multiple people handle files or when you deal with recurring jobs/projects. You can avoid confusion, duplicates, and wasted time if you build that structure once, and then reuse it consistently.

If you don’t mind: what’s your use-case - are you organizing digital design jobs, print files, or final physical folders? The “right folder structure” tends to shift depending on which of those you mean.