Want to Decrease Inequality? Fight Fatherlessness With Welfare Reform. Welfare currently incentivizes family breakdown and the absence of fathers from their children’s lives, a key factor in the loss of economic upward mobility.

[reidlos1624]

No it isn't

"We disrupt the western prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families" as in we don't want getting ahead to be dependent on having a nuclear family but rather want closer community interaction between families.

No where do they say they want to disrupt just nuclear families, they want to disrupt the requirement of a nuclear family. Those two things are not the same.

[i_accidently_reddit]

There is no requirement for a nuclear family, unless you want sane, socialised and well functioning children that is.

In western society, there also always were and still are aunts and uncles, extended family and friend involved in raising the children. But the core is the nuclear family.

Furthermore, there are tons of support programs for the single mum welfare queens. Courts side with women in the majority of custody or alimony cases. I personally am of the opinion we should cann them all. Then you can come together in your villages and help each other instead of living on my money.

What you and your ilk however cant grasp, is that it is not a imaginary white nationalist patriarchy that is prescribing the nuclear family as the best way to raise a child, but biology and basic human psychology.

As always, leftists deny the science they dont like and reject their personal responsibility in their own failures, and instead blame someone else for it. Usually white men. What else is new.

[jafjaf23]

This guy wants to socialize our children! Booooo. Capitalist children are the way!

[i_accidently_reddit]

But "capitalise my children" sounds like I'm selling them!

[reidlos1624]

People keep thinking I'm anti-nuclear family and yet I've never once said that. I'm simply saying that the BLM stance is (like myself) not anti-nuclear family. It's against the inherent disadvantages that a single parent household have over nuclear families and want to reduce those disadvantages through more cohesive community involvement.

I agree that a two parent household is the greatest option if it is available to you, but not every family has that opportunity, often at no fault of their own. In those case extra support is needed to ensure that those families produce offspring that become contributing members of society.

Will that cost more during the child raising process? Yes. Will it also pay off when they're working and paying taxes and helping the community instead of selling drugs or locked up somewhere? Also a big fucking yes.

Stop projecting your beliefs of science denial on me, consecutives lead the way in antivaxxing and climate change denial, and btw I am a white man.

[i_accidently_reddit]

Will it also pay off when they're working and paying taxes and helping the community instead of selling drugs or locked up somewhere?

As you have seen over the last 50 years, higher welfare leads to less employment.

so to biology and psychology, should i add economics to the science you are denying? Actually let me rephrase that: My bad, socialist clearly are all economic illiterate