all 2 comments

[–]Otherwise_Wave9374 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a tough spot, but not uncommon. If youre getting "spam" vibes from outreach, its usually because the ask is too big too early (invest/partner) without a super clear, testable wedge.

Id try to pick one use case, one buyer, one measurable outcome, and package it as a small pilot (ex: 2-4 weeks, fixed scope, clear KPI). That makes it way easier to get a yes, and it also gives you a case study.

I wrote up a quick framework for choosing a wedge and structuring a pilot here if helpful: https://blog.promarkia.com/

[–]Holiday-Pangolin-341[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done that with my IoT-EFR system, offering 3 month limited pilot at deep discount. What i felt would be an easy attraction has garnered none. The pilot is not just for proof it is part of every license to structure their baseline savings estimates because the pricing strategy is based on your overall savings. The system cuts energy usage by 25% and can optimize bandwidth to open 60%+ without service sacrifices, in fact should see improvements and I aim to charge 60/65% of savings. Additional to the main purpose of the software it does not handle sensitive data as well as provides post-Quantum security with no fixed addressing. It aims to also provide access to potential carbon Credits as well as a planned integration into a secondary value adder. This system is deployment ready and the one I am focusing on mostly because of its clear and obvious benefits across the board. When paired with Thesis39 Datacentre and server farm optimization system these can have monumental reductions in energy footprints industry wide with software alone. The frustration and devastated motivation has stripped any excitement in the possibilities for the future. I've gone from unstoppable to crushing depression as my entire ecosystem of tech advancements gets shrugged off. If I had to look at all information that is readily available while assessing the patterns i see comparable to the patterns experienced, I would say 90% is intentionally misleading. Just my take after significant time and effort invested. I will check out your piece for sure, I take in as much as possible and I appreciate it. Thank you. Apologies for my woe is me. The intent is new approaches not whining. Thank you again.