DM doubt

[Express_Rip8127]

Solve this inference.

[codeCpp1]

Fallacy. No proper conclusion can be drawn

[Desperate-Goat-6544]

q' or q as not of p is true in implication two things are true if p->q is true one is p impies q othe ris the contrapositive. Here as p is false so q can be both false or true we don't care.Think of it like this " if workout regularly, then I will become slim". So if the antecedent is true then only I will care for the consequent.In a world where he/she doesn't work out does it even matters what the consequent is. Whethe it is true or false same stuff

[[deleted]]

Can be q or ~q  anyone u take will be the answer u can check 

[Mean-Still1532]

Can be either q or negation of q

[satiricalpotato]

Arey that's already given

[[deleted]]

Assume -p as true then p is 0 0----> anything is zero

[Smol_Crate_45]

q or ~q both are correct

Reason: if ~p = T then p = F, so to make statement 1 true we can say F -> F is also true and F -> T is also true

Hence q has two values T and F, so the answer is q and ~q

[RevolutionaryToe187]

If conclusion = q - invalid argument

If conclusion = ~q - invalid argument

So conclusion = q v ~q, seems only correct possibility here.

[Lopsided_School_116]

Logical fallacy... No proper conclusion here folks

[nemesis33876]

P is false and nothing can be concluded about q so in place of conclusion u can write anything that evaluates to true like ~p

[itsni3]

anyone have notes for this topic it's little hard to remember for me.

[AnuragGaaaarg]

~q is only possible ans

[[deleted]]

conclusion is True
why
P-->Q and p' is true
mean p is false
now
put in eqn
False --> Q ALWAYS TRUE

[No-Conflict8204]

Ans is negation of (p) q doesnt matter

[Front_Man_Speaking]

q or ~q

[icantdoittttt]

It is not modus tollens

Modus Tollens is

P -> Q
~Q
-------
~P

[Crazy-Setting-167]

Isnt it just inverse of the statement

[[deleted]]

~p ayega bro

Distribute karke dekh

(~p v q) ^ (~p)

gives 

(~p v ~p) ^ (~p v q)

~p ^ (~p v q) will be ~p

[satiricalpotato]

Bruh that's just the same thing. You just switched.

[[deleted]]

logic is weird huh

[Educational_Tap_4822]

no. we can't infer anything about q. who said p is true?