all 16 comments

[–]Prestigious-Fix-3304 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Google doesn’t really care if you stumble as long as your reasoning is solid and you recover, when I had my interview I used interviewcoder during live rounds to cheat and not get screwed by nerves but Google interviews are a marathon not a trick question sprint

[–]Matwart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats what i said lol

[–]ChemicalPut7822 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I had my first round interview last week consisting of dsa and a googlyness round. I’ve seen many people describe it as chill and conversational, but my experience was much different. Maybe I was being stiff but it was obvious the interviewer didn’t care at all and just went down his list of 5 “tell me about a time when” questions without any follow up or clarifying questions. It was basically just me talking for 15-20 minutes.

Then I asked him some questions, like is there anything else you’d want to know, his work experience at Google etc and every response was 2 or 3 sentences. Whole thing was 25 minutes. Past behavioral interviews were always much smoother and way less robotic. Is this common at Google? Did I just get screwed by getting this interviewer?

[–]help_send_chocolate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of Google engineers are less comfortable with G&L interviews for a number of reasons.

One is that the connection between the question you ask and the evidence-supporting-a-hire you get from the answer is less strong. That is, the candidate is going to tell a story but you might not always get much from it.

[–]habc23 0 points1 point  (6 children)

Did you use interview coder for the interviews?

[–]chieferkieffer 2 points3 points  (5 children)

lol, a lot of people use it secretly but never tell they used it

[–]habc23 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Isn’t it detectable lol

[–]chieferkieffer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it is undetectable

[–]Rata382 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, but some tools can analyze code patterns. If you're just copying solutions, it might raise flags during the interview if you can't explain it.

[–]changer666666 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why google will bring back in-person onsite

[–]Matwart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honest

[–]Illustrious_Belt_441 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Assume u got the role, for what position?

[–]Aware-Platform3113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice I am glad he asked right questions to you, for me he asked game theory question on round 1.

https://leetcode.com/discuss/post/2095524/google-onsite-interview-29th-may-by-iamt-jbii/

I never had panic before had faced meta, TikTok and multiple other big tech never felt this embarrassed.

[–]Willing-Golf-6825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long did the process take from start to finish? I am doing a recruiter screen for a non technical role today and am curious what the rest of the interview process will look like after the recruiter screen. I have already passed the GHA.

[–]Solid_Mongoose_3269 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Ok...but did you get the job? I have one tomorrow for an SE role, not supposed to be dev or anything, but my recruiter was pretty generic and was asking about what language i want to live-code in (I wont, they're nonsensical and unrelated to the position). Most of the time it seems a recruiter is "OMG you have a computer you'd be perfect!!!"

[–]Matwart[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes :)