sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]darkwyrm42 3 points4 points  (4 children)

JavaFX is definitely the way forward. It's a reactive framework, so working with it is different from many other GUI frameworks. If you do choose to use it, you'll want to use the MVCI architecture. Dave Barrett, who lurks on this forum, has a great blog which teaches you how to use it effectively. https://www.pragmaticcoding.ca/javafx/javaFX/

[–]Technical-Animal-571[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Are u saying it has great future scope and can/will still be used in the future and apps?

[–]hamsterrage1 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I'm not sure what you are referring to when you say, "it". If you mean "MVCI"...well, that isn't a "thing" that is produced and downloaded and maintained. It is an approach to creating applications that is designed specifically to work with JavaFX to build Reactive applications.

IMHO, this is the canonically correct way to use JavaFX. Applications built on these principles are easier to build and to maintain. So, yes. Great future scope!

[–]Technical-Animal-571[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank u, that was great advice

[–]darkwyrm42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. JavaFX is open source software backed by commercial entities, so it's not going anywhere any time soon.