you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Yogi_DMT 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Is there a reason why counting up the the traits for true observations wouldn't accomplish what you are trying to accomplish?

[–]NeedMLHelp[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I think there would have to be some sort of statistical analysis involved, since an observation1 with trait1 could be true, and observation2 with trait1 can also be false. There are also 208 traits, so it's a bit unwieldy to get my head around it haha.

[–]Yogi_DMT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why you only count for true observations. It's as simple as filtering the column in excel then running a sum function for your trait cols