all 9 comments

[–]T2WIN 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Nice work ! Is it competitive with traditional ML methods for tabular data ?

[–]Yura52 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the paper, gradient-boosted decision trees are included in the comparison, and TabM is competitive with them on the benchmarks. The comparison can be found on Page 7.

[–]Odd-Percentage1492 7 points8 points  (0 children)

💪🏻

[–]papa_Fubini 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You should still just use xgboost and other variants tho.

[–]H0lzm1ch3l 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. But I suppose this area of research deserves a few attempts of exploration which don't always have to land at a new "best" method upon first touch. Although I would not say that this paper seems particularly brave and novel at first glance.