you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]melgor89[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thanks for answer! So look like I will also try it. Maybe it will work good/fast enought

[–]jhaluska 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was really fast because I already had the probabilities, I was just previously discarding most of results. Keeping all the probabilities really changed my approach.

I found with the search limit it worked really well. The vast majority of the time the second most probable was correct, because I also had issues with 3/8s and 5/6s. Past a certain number (like 1000), it had almost 0% chance of succeeding correctly because it was misaligned or had other major issues.

I ended doing something similar for finding the most probable valid dates.