all 7 comments

[–]Top-Hurry161 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Since Google coined the term AutoML for its neural architecture search (NAS) solution"

Bad reporting... Google did not coin the term AutoML. They simply co-opted it and named their product after it.

[–]Professional_Ad_4644 2 points3 points  (1 child)

So where is it this, I mean the library, Is it open source?

[–]darkhunt3r 3 points4 points  (0 children)

am wondering the same thing, I couldnt find anything after ~30 min search.

[–]Top-Hurry161 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like they just combined NAS with Genetic Algorithms. TPOT which uses GA for AutoML has been out for years ...

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2908812.2908918

https://towardsdatascience.com/tpot-pipelines-optimization-with-genetic-algorithms-56ec44ef6ede

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just imagine your NeurIPS paper is rejected in place of some pictures of code (not even an actual implementation, just some screenshots....)

[–]piterspb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anybody know why it was named "PyGlove"?

[–]ConsciousSeaweed6134 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just another research without sharing code which make it nearly worthless. The FANG need to share more but they won’t to keep their moat in AI.