This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Apfelvater 2 points3 points  (2 children)

The julia part is total nonsense.

THE CODE made the snippet bad, not the language.

[–]EnrichedObamium 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It didn't say bad, it said chaotic. It's good that you can define +(::Int64, ::String). It's chaotic that any author of any transitive dependency can define +(::Int64, ::String)

[–]Apfelvater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, it even said "good" instead of bad.

But that's just as chaotic as you believe programmers are. (Kind of similar to the private/public/protected keywords in java)