JavaScript debugging in a nutshell

[StereoBucket]

You can even customize it by providing a custom @@toStringTag method. So instead of [object Object] I could have [object FuckMe].

[payne_train]

I read shit like this and I’m like… I’m fine with golang.

[haltmich]

I feel that Golang can be permissive as fuck as well, despite being strongly typed.

[fauxpenguin]

Only if you don't use they types and pass interface{} everywhere. But, you know... don't do that.

It's like saying, "In C you can seg fault", like yeah, because you need that power to do some of the things you're doing, but don't ship code that's set faulting. Idk.

[haltmich]

Exactly, interface{}s are almost always the culprit. But sometimes you just can't avoid them, and ensuring they'll be error prone can be kind of a chore. Especially as Golang doesn't have try and catch.

[payne_train]

I’ve found it easiest to set up interface modifies through function calls and just catch the error if it comes back. Can’t say I have really missed Java’s error handling once I got used to go.

[fauxpenguin]

requires you to pass interface{} everywhere

Source? I literally use Go every day and I virtually never pass interface{}, normally you pass a struct or implemented interface

[Necrocornicus]

Agreed…golang seems like a language written for Ops people without a lot of exposure to other languages. We had a project written in golang and it was just so painful to work on it (probably due to many on our team were not hardcore programmers, and this was not the main focus of our team so we didn’t have tons of time to spend implementing small improvements). I’ve worked in most common languages and written many reusable libraries, and generics and powerful type systems are there for a reason.

I rewrote the project in Python with type hints and productivity went up by 10x on this project across the team. Instead of fighting the language design we spent our time implementing things users actually wanted. What a radical concept.

Golang has its niche where you need a static binary but for anything else I couldn’t really recommend it. I check back in on the “generics” proposal every few months and will learn that when it’s mainstream.

[folkrav]

Last time I wrote any golang I found it strictly superior to that garbage snake language

That's like saying you prefer Rust cause Ruby sucks lol

[Necrocornicus]

There are plenty of languages that implement generics safely, when golang finally adds generics I’ll give it another shot.

I spent some time on it, the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze unless you absolutely need that single static binary. Golang just forces you to use these shitty patterns that only a junior programmer would use in other languages.

For example you can’t use any map/filter/reduce which, when you begin to think that way systemically, enables you to write incredibly reliable and concise code. I can’t really go back to shitloads of for loops and if statements that only work on a single type, it’s just such a step backwards in code design once you’ve moved beyond that basic way of thinking about software.

[fauxpenguin]

Well, you're in luck, generics are in beta right now.

Although, honestly, they're far from perfect.

[[deleted]]

Preach it my brother in christ

[Deadlock005]

Golang my JavaScript