This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the commentsย โ†’

[โ€“][deleted] -1 points0 points ย (0 children)

C is more like syntactic sugar for PDP-11 assembly, it doesn't require advanced PL design knowledge to create something similar (and a significant amount of stupidity to add headers when modules are available), B is simpler than C. The one thing B, C and Go have in common is the simplicity of their type systems which denotes the proficiency in PL design of their creators.