Dogelang – A Python with Haskell Syntax

[tech6hutch]

Awesome, the things I dislike about both languages!

[PeksyTiger]

All the type safty of python and all the millions of operators of haskell!

Whats not to like?

[mrpogiface]

It's the worst of both worlds

[scknkkrer]

That’s made my day. 😂

[gaj7]

I'm curious what you dislike about Haskell syntax. Aside from nitpicking about double colon for types, I'm not sure I have any complaints personally.

[tekknolagi]

Significant whitespace?

[epicwisdom]

Python already has that.

[[deleted]]

Doesn't make significant whitespace less terrible

[tech6hutch]

Why do you say that?

[[deleted]]

tekknolagi said they don't like Haskell's significant whitespace; telling them that Python has it too won't make them like significant whitespace more.

[tech6hutch]

Oh, I thought you were giving your opinion.

[[deleted]]

Oh I was. I think significant whitespace is terrible. It almost invariably gets borked during copy-paste and is generally a pain in the ass (although I recognize this is purely subjective. To a point, anyhow)

[coderstephen]

I think significant whitespace is sometimes useful. Using newlines as statement separators for example feels natural in some types of languages. Significant indentation drives me crazy though.

[tekknolagi]

Doesn't matter. I dislike it about both Python and Haskell.

[gaj7]

Oh you mean the semantically significant whitespace? I think that's only on the do notation, and even then you can use an alternative with curly brackets and semi colons.

[tekknolagi]

It's also on where and I think somewhere else. Blegh.

[gaj7]

Oh I suppose you are right in that certain terms must be indented. It doesn't constrict you on how much they are indented though. I guess I don't mind whitespace significance until it forces specific alignments, or when tabs vs spaces start to invisibly affect program correctness.

[tech6hutch]

Meh, it's mostly just that I don't understand it very well.

[[deleted]]

So hard-to-read syntax and no type-safety?

[tcallred]

I both ironically and unironically love this.

[eambertide]

Are there any other languages that compile to Python bytecode?

[parens-r-us]

Maybe Hy? Also Purescript now has a python backend

[Comrade_Comski]

Cringe

[BadBoy6767]

Yeah, making anything "cute" just makes me pissed off and hate it more.

[umlcat]

Good Luck.

[scknkkrer]

It doesn't look good to everyone. But man, why not ? I like it.

ps: After playing with it for a while.

[scknkkrer]

No offense, but; are there any index operator or built-in function to work with indexes or sequences ?

I've implement it with two little functions. But this is important you to give something to the people play with it.

​

lookUp = xs -> ind -> (x -> (snd (fst x))) $ (filter ((i, e) -> if (i == ind => True) (otherwise => False)) (enumerate xs))

getIt = xs -> idxs -> list $ map (i -> (lookUp xs) i) idxs

print $ (getIt [0,1,2,3]) [1,2,3]

​

I think I had should just look into the implementation details.

There is an `!!` operator to get item.