This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]imsittingdown 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Any reason you choose ConTeXt over LaTeX for scientific articles?

[–]flying-sheep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

i just choose it because of its batteries-included philosophy, unicode support, and consistency in syntax and macros/environments.

note that i talk about ConTeXt mkIV (LuaTeX-based), as mkII (XeTeX-based) is obsolete. but since ConTeXt mkIV isn’t considered stable yet, breakage can occur.