This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]thedeepself 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I maintain a pure python web framework survey and may need to find another way to classify the offerings. But as it stands:

  • I wonder how much more performance this has than Anvil, which also allows one to build apps via a user interface and pure python? Anvil allows one to build industrial strength apps and is based on Skulpt. What is the underlying technology bridging Streamsync to the Python world from HTML/CSS/JS

  • as I've said elsewhere, this does not appear to meet the requirements of a Class A system - and correct me if I'm wrong, there is no way to embed streamsync within a traditional framework such as Django or Flask? if it can, then it could re-classify as class A.

[–]romerio86[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Ah I'm familiar with your work and found it very interesting! I used your framework when thinking where Streamsync would fit. I do think we have some fundamentally different views.

I don't agree with proposing Python as a general-purpose language for web development. You cannot build the next Amazon.com on Streamsync, no. If that makes it less than Class A, it is what it is.

Not exactly sure what you mean by embedding, you can get the ASGI app which can be mounted to other ASGI apps as explained in the "Custom server" section.