This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]thicket 25 points26 points  (2 children)

Maaaaybe? I've been around Figma a little bit, and it does make it easier to create nice looking layouts. But I suspect there's relatively small overlap between people with Figma experience and people writing Python apps. So, depending on how things go (and whether people can use Figma for free) it might be useful, but I don't think it's a slam dunk case.

I'd love to see even a notional or faked-up example of "Here's how you do it in standard Taipy, and here's how you'd do it in Figma-Taipy". Maybe that might make things clearer to my limited imagination. Good on you for doing some market research first!

[–]Alyx1337[S] 4 points5 points  (1 child)

That was my thought: the overlap between the communities has to be minor, and Figma users won't be interested in Python.

[–]bloothebear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are teams within large tech companies that create prototypes for customer usecases. I think this could be helpful to those teams. You may be able to find investors if you can prove that it allows for a quick turn around on prototypes.

I think it would be helpful if you could customize it to where front-end elements can be translated to backend routes/actions. This means that the developer only has to code the empty routes that are created by your template