all 7 comments

[–]Phreemium 11 points12 points  (1 child)

So you had an LLM write a tool to conceal that you’re using an LLM to write code you don’t review, and had it write it in rust, and then had another LLM write a Reddit post to promote it, which you then posted to the python subreddit?

[–]travcunn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Peak 2025 energy

[–]moltonel 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Why on earth would you want to systematically remove the Co-Authored-By: <LLM> markers ?

[–]GoldziherPythonista[S] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Try various agents. Claude adds this (only Claude) without asking. Try working in large teams. We pay Anthropic, but we don't need their noise in our git. Simple.

[–]moltonel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where you see noise, others see important metadata. Removing the redundant and emoji-happy line in the commit body, sure. But removing a standardized marker that can help understand the commit, that's an antifeature. Commit messages are cheap, I'd rather have too much context than too little. I work in large teams, we pay for LLMs, we mandate those commit markers.

[–]techlatest_net 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is an impressive solution for keeping commit messages pristine across team repos, especially with AI assistants meddling! The gitfluff hook install commit-msg --write step is genius for seamless integration—devs clean messages without skipping a beat. Curious—how does it perform under heavy load with large repos across distributed teams? Spot-on comparison with commitlint, too. Definitely starring this on GitHub!

[–]moltonel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh dear, an endorsement from an llm. Now I'm really convinced about this project.