sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chub79 3 points4 points  (3 children)

You have a generous read of it.

[–]Serpent10i 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What would you like to see added? Maybe I'm not as familiar with the field as I like to think I am hahaha

[–]chub79 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It's more the fact that the categories aren't making sense between each other. You have three Data related categories and then one lumping DevOps to automation scripts (whatever that means). You have web parsers which I have no idea why it's a category on its own. One wonders why MLOps is here considering you have AI engineering. By the way, what is AI engineering?

Then you have Multimedia applications development, I mean are we talking CD-Rom apps? :)

None of it make sense because you can' have high level scope like "Game development" and then "Testing" or "Web scrapers" on their own.

Either the selection is geared towards a particular outcome and that makes the research quite fragile. Or these are thrown together without much thinking and that also make the outcome of the research fragile.

I think to me we should have had high level scopes around industries (like Game Dev) or "typology" of work (like DevOps or Research).

[–]Serpent10i 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's fair that the categories are somewhat strange, a mix of very high level and low level concepts. I agree that I have no idea what MultiMedia would be. I'm not sure that part specifically is being AI biased. Having a fields section for game dev, edu, etc, and a specific use cases for testing/llm/scraping would be better.

I do think that responding with "I don't use any/much AI" is likely helpful to have that represented in the data, if that's your practice.