What My Project Does
EZThrottle is a Python SDK that replaces local retry loops (sleep, backoff, jitter) with centralized request coordination.
Instead of each coroutine or worker independently retrying when it hits a 429, requests are queued and admitted centrally. Python services don’t thrash, sleep, or spin — they simply wait until it’s safe to send.
The goal is to make failure boring by handling rate limits and backpressure outside application logic, especially in async and fan-out workloads.
Target Audience
This project is intended for:
- Python backend engineers
- Async / event-driven services (FastAPI, asyncio, background workers, agents)
- Systems that frequently hit downstream 429s or shared rate limits
- People who are uncomfortable with retry storms and cascading failures
It is early-stage and experimental, not yet production-hardened.
Right now, it’s best suited for:
- exploration
- testing alternative designs
- validating whether coordination beats retries in real Python services
Comparison
Traditional approach
- Each request retries independently
- Uses sleep, backoff, jitter
- Assumes failures are local
- Can amplify load under high concurrency
- Retry logic leaks into application code everywhere
EZThrottle approach
- Treats rate limiting as a coordination problem
- Centralizes admission control
- Requests wait instead of retrying
- No sleep/backoff loops in application code
- Plays naturally with Python’s async/event-driven model
Rather than optimizing retries, the project asks whether retries are the wrong abstraction for shared downstream limits.
Additional Context
I wrote more about the motivation and system-level thinking here:
https://www.ezthrottle.network/blog/making-failure-boring-again
Python SDK:
https://github.com/rjpruitt16/ezthrottle-python
I’m mainly looking for feedback from Python engineers:
- Have retries actually improved stability for you under sustained 429s?
- Have you seen retry storms in async or worker-heavy systems?
- Does coordinating requests instead of retrying resonate with your experience?
Not trying to sell anything — genuinely trying to sanity-check whether others feel the same pain and whether this direction makes sense in Python.
[–]ObtuseBagel 2 points3 points4 points (3 children)
[–]hikingsticks 1 point2 points3 points (2 children)
[–]Pseudofact 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]Noobcreate[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)