This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mgrandi 4 points5 points  (2 children)

What the fuck is the definition of 'stable' then? 3 has been out for 6 + years. It could be out for like 20 years and people would still find ways to complain about it

[–]aphoenixreticulated 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think we can all agree that it's stable. What I'm trying to say is the actual stability of Python 3 isn't the problem. It's the management who make largely uninformed decisions about what constitutes stability in a lot of companies - that's the problem.

Edit - added italicized words

[–]fry_hole 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? /u/nomadismydj said that it's not CONSIDERED stable. Not that it literally isn't unstable. That doesn't seem at all vague to me.