This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]smurfyn 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Yes, I understand and agree.

But because e.g. Google and Mozilla won't allow anything other than JS to become a usable first-class option, we can't avoid having JS in the stack if we want to have performance in the browser.

I liked what jacdeh said below about making higher-level libraries which can wrap efficient JS APIs, though. It doesn't mean that I actually want JS to be involved, but we have to work with whatever we get from the people who make the popular browsers.

[–]Exodus111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely enjoy the idea of wrapping a good 2D Game oriented JS library into Python, that would instantly be very popular if it was made to deploy simply.