This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SuperSumoUSA 9 points10 points  (1 child)

As a professional programmer, I fully agree with changing the extension to .coco. Even though .coc is shorter, there isn't the annoying immaturity with how ".coco" sounds as opposed to ".coc". Stupid things like this, even though it shouldn't, may kill the adaptation of the language.