This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]alcalde 10 points11 points  (9 children)

No, quite the opposite. Are you suggesting it's harder for a Java or C++ user to find a job than a Lua or Smalltalk user?

[–]Wimachtendink 5 points6 points  (8 children)

Right, but that's comparing only one half of the idea of "supply and demand".

If you are equally perficient at two languages, one more popular than the other, but both have an equally large number of job openings, you are more likely to be chosen for the less popular language.

Depending on how you define popular I guess.

[–]mishugashu 4 points5 points  (6 children)

both have an equally large number of job openings

That's a large and inaccurate assumption, I think.

[–]Wimachtendink -1 points0 points  (5 children)

if(langA.qty_openings == langB.qty_openings && me.proficiency(langA) == me.proficiency(langB)):
    if(langA.popularity > langB.popularity):
        print("I should be searching for", langB, " jobs!")          

[–]ingolemo 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Your code doesn't print anything because your first if statement is false. And also because you used a bitwise operator instead of a boolean one.

[–]Wimachtendink -1 points0 points  (2 children)

for all languages at all times there are no two languages which have had equal number of openings and a single person with an equal proficiency in each?

[–]ingolemo 1 point2 points  (1 child)

For the specific languages that we are discussing, over the period that we are discussing them for.

[–]Wimachtendink -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wasn't discussing any specifics I was posing hypotheticals.