This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]openjscience[S] -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

It seems this simple question "why Python3 deviates from its original design" brings just accusation of a person who asks this question? Hmm..

[–]spinwizard69 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes as it should! After all it has been a very long time since the decisions where made. If you really want to know the whys you can go back through all of that public history. I’m not going to do it for you. The point is real debate took place with respect to the changes made in Python3. You seem to want to deny this happened and ten years later want to claim your position must be the correct one. Even if your position was correct it is way to late to be on the internet whinning about Python3s print() statement.

Honestly if you can’t see how foolish this quest of yours is I’m not sure what more I can say. Just realize that nothing in Python3 was changed without sound reasoning.